Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Singapore decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The High Court struck out an originating application over the Seaview Property as barred by res judicata and limitation, and allowed the respondent’s appeal.
The Small Claims Tribunals held that both the claim and counterclaim were out of time under the SCTA’s two-year jurisdictional limit and discontinued the proceedings.
The High Court dismissed an application to strike out a claim to enforce a 2018 settlement agreement over the Seaview Property, finding no res judicata or time bar.
The District Court set aside an order for security for costs, holding that security was not just despite the claimant’s residence abroad and impecuniosity.
The High Court dismissed misrepresentation claims by purchasers of Macpherson Mall units, finding alleged statements about area, rental yield, and signage were not actionable.
The court allowed an appeal in a cladding-defect dispute, holding that limitation turned on fact-sensitive knowledge questions unsuited to strike out on the available material.
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal to set aside an arbitral award, holding there was no actionable natural justice breach and no real prejudice.
The High Court held that a Taiwanese judgment became final and conclusive only after appeals were exhausted, so the Singapore enforcement claim was not time-barred.
The High Court held that Ms Lim’s third-party contribution claims were time-barred under s 6A of the Limitation Act and upheld the striking out of the TPSOCs.
Minority oppression claim under s 216 succeeded in part. The High Court found commercial unfairness in salary changes and unpaid distributions, and ordered a buy-out.
Explore more
