Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure [2026] SGHC(A) 16

Capajet Pte. Ltd. v EV Technology Pte. Ltd. & 3 Ors

The court held permission was required to appeal a dismissal of summary judgment, but refused permission in both appeals because no appealable error or striking-out ground was shown.

  • Permission to appeal
  • Summary judgment
  • Striking out
  • Unlawful means conspiracy
  • Parol evidence
  • Costs
Read case analysis
Company law [2025] SGHC 149

PARK HOTEL MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) & 2 Ors v LAW CHING HUNG & 3 Ors

The High Court found Mr Law breached fiduciary duties by transferring PHMPL’s assets and business to companies he controlled at undervalue, and held the defendant companies liable for related assistance and receipt.

  • Directors' fiduciary duties
  • Transactions at an undervalue (irda s224)
  • Unfair preference (irda s225)
  • Back-dating and journal entries
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Knowing receipt
Read case analysis
Contract [2025] SGHC 75

CASTILLON SECURITY (S) PTE. LTD. v MUHAMMAD SHAUN ERIC BIN ABDULLAH

The High Court held that government grants had to be apportioned under an employment profit-sharing arrangement, upheld the employee’s entitlement to further sums, and dismissed claims for wrongful dismissal and conspiracy.

  • Profit‑sharing agreement
  • Government grants (jss, wcs, sec)
  • Contractual interpretation
  • Summary dismissal
  • Unfair dismissal
  • Director liability
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2023] SGHCR 13

GILLINGHAM JAMES IAN v FEARLESS LEGENDS PTE. LTD & 3 Ors

The High Court granted narrowed pre-action production for a proposed minority oppression and conspiracy claim, but limited the scope, timeframe, and ordered costs against the applicant.

  • Pre-action production
  • Minority oppression (s 216 companies act)
  • Conspiracy (tort)
  • Disclosure of documents
  • Costs entitlement
  • Security for costs
Read case analysis
Company law [2023] SGHC 80

LIANG XIHONG v LOONG SOO MIN & Anor

The High Court dismissed competing oppression, trust, conspiracy and assistance claims between former spouses over company shares, dividends, set-offs and a joint account withdrawal.

  • Oppression (s216 ca)
  • Dividends and set-off
  • Quasi-partnership
  • Breach of trust
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Unlawful and lawful means conspiracy
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2022] SGHC 136

ONI GLOBAL PTE. LTD. v WONG YONG KAI

The High Court dismissed an appeal against setting aside leave to serve out of jurisdiction. It found reflective loss, weak proof of predominant intention, and no forum basis.

  • Service out of jurisdiction
  • Conspiracy (lawful vs unlawful)
  • Reflective loss
  • Director immunity (said v butt)
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Risk of double recovery
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2021] SGHC 33

GTMS CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v SER KIM KOI

The High Court awarded the plaintiff and third parties costs, with indemnity costs from specified dates, declined a Certificate of Three Counsel, and granted omitted interest.

  • Indemnity costs
  • Standard basis costs
  • Calderbank offers
  • Offers to settle (o.22a)
  • Rules of court order 59
  • Certificate of three counsel
Read case analysis
Companies law [2020] SGHC 214

NG TANG HOCK V TEELEK REALTY PTE LTD & 3 ORS

The High Court found oppression in Teelek Realty’s affairs, ordered the company wound up, cancelled invalid share transfers, and ordered restitution of $12.564 million.

  • Oppression under s216 companies act
  • Winding up
  • Derivative action
  • Limitation and acknowledgement of debt
  • Waiver of debt
  • Breach of directors' duties
Read case analysis
Equity [2018] SGHC 239

WINSTA HOLDING PTE LTD & 7 Ors v SIM POH PING & 12 Ors

High Court judgment on fiduciary breaches, dishonest assistance, and equitable compensation arising from Winsta Group business opportunities and related transactions.

  • Fiduciary duties
  • No-conflict rule
  • No-profit rule
  • Equitable compensation
  • Dishonest assistance
  • Causation
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2015] SGHC 267

Clearlab SG Pte Ltd v Ting Chong Chai and others

The High Court upheld a $270,000 costs order for the seventh and eighth defendants, finding their counsel’s 32-day attendance at a 49-day trial was reasonable.

  • Costs of counsel
  • Reasonableness of attendance
  • Apportionment of costs
  • Precedent comparisons
  • Costs-law
  • Civil-procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.