Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Singapore decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The District Court held that a binding contract arose when Motor Image accepted AP Media’s fee quote on Xero, and that Motor Image repudiatorily breached by refusing to pay.
The court dismissed the claimant’s wrongful termination, AL-LTI, Sell-out, UCTA and unjust enrichment claims, and also dismissed the defendant’s counterclaim.
The District Court dismissed Dots N Tots’ claim, rejected duress-based repayment claims, and allowed the 1st defendant’s commission counterclaim in part.
The District Court found the defendant liable for unauthorized absences, shortfall hours, unjust enrichment from free treatments, and misappropriated customer payments.
The High Court allowed an appeal against strike-out orders, holding that the unjust enrichment and UCTA issues should generally be tested at trial, with pleadings possibly amended.
The court found a contract for the sale of a 20% stake in Star Dust, held Cheng liable for breach and unjust enrichment, and awarded Tjandra US$500,000.
The High Court dismissed a Bitcoin sale claim, finding the plaintiff was not the proper contracting party and the defendant was acting for Qrypt, not personally.
The High Court dismissed a $4 million debt and unjust enrichment claim, holding the plaintiff failed to prove oral loan agreements and any recognised unjust factor.
The Appellate Division dismissed an appeal in a no-case-to-answer ruling, holding that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie FX agreement supporting his claims.
The High Court found that the defendants conspired to misappropriate funds from Anpex Pte Ltd and held them jointly and severally liable for $578,347.30.
Explore more
