Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Singapore decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The District Court dismissed Prime Lodge’s claim for alleged non-performance of laundry services and RFID tags, and allowed United Laundry’s counterclaim for unpaid invoices.
The District Court held that Tan’s demand terminated the returns obligation, rejected any variation of the restoration obligation beyond $10,000, and awarded only $50 nominal damages.
The District Court dismissed the defendant’s counterclaim, finding the plaintiff was not contractually bound to fulfill every order confirmation and no breach was proved.
The High Court held that “introduction” in a recruitment terms of service referred to a fresh hiring cycle, so the respondent could claim a placement fee.
The Appellate Division dismissed Jonathan Glassberg’s appeal against UBS, holding that the relationship manager’s DLIF recommendation was personal and outside the APA Service.
Liberty Engineering Group Pte. Ltd. v Renault SAS [2024] SGCA(I) 7 (8 October 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that Alvance became a party to the FSA by adherence under French law, so LEG was liable under its guarantee for the unpaid loan balance.
The court held that the Bond Account closure condition was met and ordered the bond amount and interest returned to the claimant.
The appeal concerned the interpretation of 1997 settlement deeds governing concurrent use of the name “Nalli” and related trade mark and passing off rights.
Renault SAS v Liberty Engineering Group Pte Ltd (Credit and Security - Guarantees and indemnities) [2024] SGHC(I) 6 (14 February 2024)
The court held that Alvance was not a party to the FSA, but a separate contract arose from its request and acceptance of funds. OA 9 succeeded; OA 3 was dismissed.
The High Court held that a tenancy agreement gave the tenant a 24-month renewal option capped at 10% above current rent, and the tenant validly exercised it.
Explore more
