Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual property [2026] SGCA 22

LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER v Ng Hoe Seng (formerly trading as EMCASE SG)

The Court of Appeal held that statutory damages for counterfeit trade mark use are capped per type of goods and per action, then increased the award to S$510,000.

  • Statutory damages
  • Assessment of damages
  • Interpretation of statute
  • Account of profits
  • Deterrence
  • Trade-marks
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure [2025] SGHC 192

KATCHU MOHIDEEN BAZEER AHAMED v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging section 106A of the Criminal Procedure Code and upheld a six-week jail sentence for criminal bail-indemnity conduct.

  • Bail
  • Surety
  • Indemnity agreements
  • Void contracts
  • Equal protection
  • Right to life and personal liberty
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2025] SGHC 133

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v LIN PENGLI, BARRIE

The High Court increased the respondent’s aggregate sentence for multiple cat cruelty offences from 14 to 27 months, emphasizing deterrence, premeditation, and only limited mitigation for depression.

  • Animal cruelty
  • Sentencing principles
  • Consecutive sentences
  • Mitigation for mental disorder
  • Guilty plea reduction
  • Animals and birds act interpretation
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2025] SGHC 121

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v GUMEDE STHEMBISO JOEL

High Court allowed a criminal revision and ordered forfeiture of an iPhone, Macbook and charger used to plan and carry out ESA offences.

  • Disposal of property
  • Forfeiture
  • Endangered species trafficking
  • Mutual legal assistance
  • Deterrence
  • Criminal-revision
Read case analysis
Intellectual property [2025] SGHC 122

LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER v Ng Hoe Seng (formerly trading as EMCASE SG)

High Court assessment of statutory damages for trade mark counterfeiting. The court found counterfeit trade marks were used and awarded SGD 200,000 with costs.

  • Statutory damages
  • Counterfeit trade mark
  • Damages assessment
  • Goodwill depreciation
  • Deterrence
  • Trade-mark-infringement
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure [2024] SGHC 267

JCY v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed JCY’s appeal against sentence and his fresh-evidence application, holding that reformative training remained appropriate for a youthful offender.

  • Adducing fresh evidence
  • Reformative training
  • Probation
  • Deterrence
  • Retribution
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] SGHC 207

PRASANTH S/O MOGAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed a young offender’s appeal, upholding reformative training for rioting with a deadly weapon, voyeurism, and related intimidation.

  • Young offenders
  • Reformative training
  • Probation
  • Rioting with a deadly weapon
  • Voyeurism
  • Retribution
Read case analysis
Consumer protection [2023] SGHC 203

NAIL PALACE (BPP) PTE. LTD. v COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION OF SINGAPORE

High Court dismissed appeals against publication and consumer-notification orders under Singapore’s CPFTA, holding the orders were proportionate and properly made.

  • Unfair practices
  • Injunctions
  • Accompanying orders
  • Publication orders
  • Consumer notification and consent
  • Proportionality
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] SGHC 202

TIEN KIAT CHONG v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed a sentencing appeal in a voyeurism case, holding that the adult offender did not show an extremely strong propensity for reform and that 12 weeks’ imprisonment was not excessive.

  • Voyeurism
  • Probation orders
  • Rehabilitation
  • Deterrence
  • Sentencing precedents
  • Probation-orders
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2023] SGHC 62

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v RIZUWAN BIN ROHMAT

The High Court increased a sentence for driving without a valid licence, adopting a benchmark of four weeks’ imprisonment for the archetypal case under s 35(1) RTA.

  • Sentencing framework
  • Driving without a valid licence
  • Deterrence
  • Benchmark sentencing
  • Sentencing
  • Driving-without-valid-licence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.