Sign in
Singapore Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Singapore Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Singapore decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family law [2026] SGFC 42

TMV v TMU

The court allowed the respondent to examine the Maintenance Enforcement Officer, finding the officer’s income estimation methodology was directly relevant to arrears repayment orders.

  • Maintenance enforcement
  • Maintenance enforcement officer (meo) examination
  • Admissibility of meo report
  • Procedure under family justice (general) rules
  • Maintenance-enforcement
  • Maintenance-enforcement-officer
Read case analysis
Damages [2026] SGMC 37

Chen Eng Kiat v Muhammad Helmy Bin Mohd Hasbollah

Assessment of damages after a road traffic accident: general damages were awarded, rental charges were proved, but repair costs were rejected for lack of proof.

  • Special damages
  • General damages
  • Assessment of damages
  • Admissibility
  • Costs
  • Assessment-of-damages
Read case analysis
Contract [2026] SGHC 1

Chan Tuck Cheong v Sin Wee Hiong

The High Court held that a signed 2013 acknowledgment was not a sham, found an $800,000 loan was genuine, and allowed the defendant’s counterclaim for $578,000.

  • Intention to create legal relations
  • Sham
  • Loan and repayment
  • Parol evidence rule
  • Part payment/acknowledgment
  • Limitation
Read case analysis
Family law [2025] SGFC 116

XTQ v XTR

The Family Court granted the wife a judgment of judicial separation, finding the husband’s misleading and secretive conduct made continued cohabitation unreasonable.

  • Judicial separation
  • Unreasonable behaviour
  • Reconciliation
  • Costs
  • Forum non conveniens
  • Evidence
Read case analysis
Equity [2025] SGHC 80

RITA KISHINCHAND BHOJWANI v HVS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 Ors

The High Court dismissed a daughter’s claims to remain in a family company apartment, finding no proved representation, reliance, or enforceable licence.

  • Proprietary estoppel
  • Licence coupled with equity
  • Contractual licence
  • Bare licence and notice to quit
  • No case to answer (prima facie standard)
  • Calling opposing party as witness
Read case analysis
Contract [2025] SGHC 40

SHIPWORKS ENGINEERING PTE LTD v SEMBCORP MARINE INTEGRATED YARD PTE LTD

The court assessed quantum after the main liability judgment, resolving disputes over faint timesheets, administrative charges, recovery of paid sums, and disputed work orders.

  • Breach of contract
  • Assessment of damages
  • Authenticity of timesheets
  • Counterclaim for repayment
  • Administrative charge entitlement
  • Breach-of-contract
Read case analysis
Civil procedure [2025] SGHC 14

VIBRANT GROUP LIMITED v TONG CHI HO & Anor

The High Court found the defendants liable in deceit over false statements about Blackgold Group’s mining, trading, shipping and receivables, awarding Vibrant damages and interest.

  • Deceit (fraud)
  • Misrepresentation
  • No case to answer
  • Attribution via third parties
  • Damages for fraudulent misrepresentation
  • Hearsay and compellability
Read case analysis
Contract [2025] SGHC(I) 1

MARKETLEND PTY LTD v QBE INSURANCE (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.

Trade credit insurance claims were dismissed after the court found an unauthorised assignment, breaches of cooperation and disclosure terms, and insufficient proof of genuine trades.

  • Assignment
  • Consent
  • Estoppel
  • Hearsay
  • Business records exception
  • Condition precedent
Read case analysis
Criminal procedure and sentencing [2024] SGHC 323

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v SENTEK MARINE & TRADING PTE LTD & 3 Ors

The High Court granted the Prosecution’s application for a single joint trial of CDSA, PCA and Penal Code charges linked to the Shell Pulau Bukom misappropriation inquiry.

  • Joinder
  • Same transaction
  • Joint trial
  • Prejudice
  • Cdsa offences
  • Pca offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law [2024] SGHC 306

THANGARAJAN ELANCHEZHIAN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction and six-month sentence for outrage of modesty, and gave guidance on managing cross-examination in sexual offence trials.

  • Outrage of modesty
  • Sexual offences
  • Sentencing
  • Evidence
  • Cross-examination management
  • Judicial case management
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Singapore decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.