ET Solutions South Africa 1 (Pty) Ltd v Main Street 957 (RF) (Pty) Ltd; ET Solutions South Africa 1 (Pty) Ltd v Ramizone (RF) (Pty) Ltd (2021/2321;) [2022] ZAGPJHC 45; 20212333 (10 February 2022)

ET Solutions South Africa 1 (Pty) Ltd v Main Street 957 (RF) (Pty) Ltd; ET Solutions South Africa 1 (Pty) Ltd v Ramizone (RF) (Pty) Ltd (2021/2321;) [2022] ZAGPJHC 45; 20212333 (10 February 2022)

The court found that the dispute regarding the entitlement to delayed liquidated damages and the applicant's extension of time claims is an arbitrable dispute under the contract. The applicant has elected to refer the dispute to arbitration, thereby waiving its entitlement to approach the court for a determination on those issues. The contract provides that disputes not settled amicably may be referred to arbitration under the AFSA Rules. Since the applicant has invoked arbitration, the court held that the matter should be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration proceedings. The court did not decide the merits of the set-off or the payment of the certified milestones, as these...

Citation
[2022] ZAGPJHC 45
Parties
Applicant: ET Solutions South Africa 1 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Main Street 957 (RF) (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ramizone (RF) (Pty) Ltd
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 February 2022
Case Number
2021/2321
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay Pending Arbitration
Outcome
Application stayed pending arbitration.
Judges
Matojane
Legal Topics
Arbitration Clause Enforcement, Set Off, Liquidated Damages, Construction Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ET Solutions South Africa 1 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Main Street 957 (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Ramizone (RF) (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay Pending Arbitration

  1. 1 Whether the certified payment milestones are due and payable to the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was entitled to set off delayed liquidated damages against the claimed amount.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute regarding delayed liquidated damages and extension of time claims must be resolved by arbitration.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute regarding the entitlement to delayed liquidated damages and the applicant's extension of time claims is an arbitrable dispute under the contract. The applicant has elected to refer the dispute to arbitration, thereby waiving its entitlement to approach the court for a determination on those issues. The contract provides that disputes not settled amicably may be referred to arbitration under the AFSA Rules. Since the applicant has invoked arbitration, the court held that the matter should be stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration proceedings. The court did not decide the merits of the set-off or the payment of the certified milestones, as these...

Court Disposition

Application stayed pending arbitration.

Orders

  • The applications are stayed pending the outcome of arbitration proceedings.
  • Costs are reserved.