Makhothokho and Others v Pick n Pay Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd and Another (JS345/17) [2022] ZALCJHB 114 (24 May 2022)

Makhothokho and Others v Pick n Pay Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd and Another (JS345/17) [2022] ZALCJHB 114 (24 May 2022)

The court found that the applicants voluntarily entered into retrenchment agreements after negotiations regarding severance pay and leave payout, and that they received and retained benefits exceeding statutory minimums. The evidence showed that alternative positions were offered and discussed, and the applicants opted for retrenchment and higher monetary compensation. The applicants failed to prove any duress or unlawful pressure; the only alleged duress was financial, which does not suffice under South African law. The applicants did not tender repayment of benefits received, and their conduct was inconsistent with repudiation of the agreement. The court held that the agreements...

Citation
[2022] ZALCJHB 114
Parties
Applicant: N W Makhothokho and 34 Others; Respondent: Pick n Pay Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Capital Outsourcing (COSTARS)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 May 2022
Case Number
JS345/17
Procedural Posture
Labour Law Application / Trial and Determination of Points in Limine
Outcome
Both respondents' points in limine are upheld; the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the unfair dismissal dispute due to the full and final settlement agreement.
Judges
Prinsloo
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Retrenchment Agreements, Duress in Settlement, Section 189 Consultation, Full and Final Settlement
Labour Law Civil Procedure Unfair Dismissal Retrenchment Agreements Duress in Settlement Section 189 Consultation Full and Final Settlement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

N W Makhothokho and 34 Others

Applicant

Pick n Pay Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Capital Outsourcing (COSTARS)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Labour Law Application / Trial and Determination of Points in Limine

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' retrenchment was procedurally and substantively unfair under section 189 of the LRA.
  2. 2 Whether the retrenchment agreements signed by the applicants constitute full and final settlement, barring further claims.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants signed the agreements under duress, rendering them invalid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants voluntarily entered into retrenchment agreements after negotiations regarding severance pay and leave payout, and that they received and retained benefits exceeding statutory minimums. The evidence showed that alternative positions were offered and discussed, and the applicants opted for retrenchment and higher monetary compensation. The applicants failed to prove any duress or unlawful pressure; the only alleged duress was financial, which does not suffice under South African law. The applicants did not tender repayment of benefits received, and their conduct was inconsistent with repudiation of the agreement. The court held that the agreements...

Court Disposition

Both respondents' points in limine are upheld; the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the unfair dismissal dispute due to the full and final settlement agreement.

Orders

  • The First Respondent’s point in limine is upheld.
  • The Second Respondent’s point in limine is upheld.