Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2022] ZALCJHB 114

Makhothokho and Others v Pick n Pay Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd and Another (JS345/17)

Makhothokho and Others v Pick n Pay Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd and Another (JS345/17) [2022] ZALCJHB 114 (24 May 2022)

The Labour Court held that retrenchment agreements signed by the applicants were voluntary, binding full and final settlements, defeating their unfair dismissal claims.

  • Unfair Dismissal
  • Retrenchment Agreements
  • Duress In Settlement
  • Section 189 Consultation
  • Full And Final Settlement
  • Unfair-dismissal
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2018] ZALCJHB 340

National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa and Others v Clear Creek Trading 167 (Pty) Ltd t/a Wireforce (JS656/16)

National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa and Others v Clear Creek Trading 167 (Pty) Ltd t/a Wireforce (JS656/16) [2018] ZALCJHB 340 (12 October 2018)

The court found that Wireforce failed to comply with the requirements of section 189 of the Labour Relations Act, as the retrenchment process was neither procedurally nor substantively fair. The applicant employees were coerced into signing settlement agreements under duress, without proper consultation or representation, and NUMSA was deliberately excluded from the process. The evidence established that Wireforce's approach was designed to circumvent statutory requirements and procure signatures on settlement agreements, rather than engage in genuine consultation. The settlement agreements a…

  • Unfair Dismissal
  • Retrenchment Procedure
  • Duress In Settlement
  • Compensation For Unfair Dismissal
  • Section 189 Consultation
  • Full And Final Settlement
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2012] ZALCJHB 169

Fakude and Others v Kwikot (Pty) Ltd (JS 661/05)

Fakude and Others v Kwikot (Pty) Ltd (JS 661/05) [2012] ZALCJHB 169; [2013] 6 BLLR 580 (LC); (2013) 34 ILJ 2024 (LC) (27 December 2012)

The court held that the collective agreement concluded by NUMSA on behalf of the employees was valid and enforceable, binding both union members and identified non-members. The union had statutory authority to act without individual member consent, and the applicants voluntarily joined the union, accepting the consequences of majority decisions. The individual settlement agreements signed by the applicants were not vitiated by duress, as economic pressure alone does not constitute duress under South African law. The applicants failed to establish that the agreements were signed under unlawful…

  • Collective Agreements
  • Trade Union Powers
  • Dismissal Definition
  • Duress In Settlement
  • Public Policy Contracts
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.