Makhubela v S (A320/2017) [2018] ZANCHC 25 (9 May 2018)

Makhubela v S (A320/2017) [2018] ZANCHC 25 (9 May 2018)

The court found that the complainant's version contained significant inconsistencies and lacked corroboration from key witnesses who were present during the alleged incident. The complainant did not report the rape to any adult immediately, and her conduct after the incident was inconsistent with that of a rape victim. The appellant's version of consensual intercourse was reasonably possibly true, and the State failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence that the appellant knew the complainant was under sixteen years of age, precluding a competent verdict of statutory rape. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the...

Citation
[2018] ZANCHC 25
Parties
Appellant: Zakaria Makhubela; Respondent: The State
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
9 May 2018
Case Number
A320/2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted.
Judges
NM MBHELE, S BENADE
Legal Topics
Rape, Reasonable Doubt, Competent Verdict, Sexual Offences Act, Consent, Child Sexual Offences
Criminal Law Rape Reasonable Doubt Competent Verdict Sexual Offences Act Consent Child Sexual Offences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Zakaria Makhubela

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was correctly found guilty of rape.
  2. 2 Whether, if rape was not proved, a competent verdict of statutory rape under section 15 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 should be entered.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the complainant's version contained significant inconsistencies and lacked corroboration from key witnesses who were present during the alleged incident. The complainant did not report the rape to any adult immediately, and her conduct after the incident was inconsistent with that of a rape victim. The appellant's version of consensual intercourse was reasonably possibly true, and the State failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence that the appellant knew the complainant was under sixteen years of age, precluding a competent verdict of statutory rape. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence were set aside, and the...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; conviction and sentence set aside; appellant acquitted.

Orders

  • The appeal succeeds.
  • The conviction and sentence are set aside.