Masakhane v S (A369/2007) [2015] ZAFSHC 120 (1 June 2015)

Masakhane v S (A369/2007) [2015] ZAFSHC 120 (1 June 2015)

The court found that the reconstructed record, together with the transcribed portions, was sufficient for a fair hearing. The appellant's missing evidence was not material, as it was not put to the state witness and would not have affected the outcome. The trial court's evaluation of the evidence was correct, and there was no misdirection in convicting the appellant. The sentence of 24 months' imprisonment was not shockingly inappropriate, and neither counsel could assail it. However, given the extraordinary delay not attributable to the appellant and the four months already served, justice and equity required an unusual remedy. The remaining portion of the sentence was suspended under...

Citation
[2015] ZAFSHC 120
Parties
Appellant: Andries Makhasane; Respondent: The State
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
1 June 2015
Case Number
A369/2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Conviction and sentence confirmed; remaining portion of imprisonment suspended.
Judges
Naidoo, Williams
Legal Topics
Stock Theft, Sentence Appeal, Record Reconstruction, Suspension of Sentence
Criminal Law Stock Theft Sentence Appeal Record Reconstruction Suspension of Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andries Makhasane

Appellant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the reconstructed record was sufficient for a fair appeal hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the conviction for stock theft should be upheld.
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was appropriate given the circumstances and delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the reconstructed record, together with the transcribed portions, was sufficient for a fair hearing. The appellant's missing evidence was not material, as it was not put to the state witness and would not have affected the outcome. The trial court's evaluation of the evidence was correct, and there was no misdirection in convicting the appellant. The sentence of 24 months' imprisonment was not shockingly inappropriate, and neither counsel could assail it. However, given the extraordinary delay not attributable to the appellant and the four months already served, justice and equity required an unusual remedy. The remaining portion of the sentence was suspended under...

Court Disposition

Conviction and sentence confirmed; remaining portion of imprisonment suspended.

Orders

  • The conviction and sentence are confirmed.
  • The remaining portion of 20 months of imprisonment is suspended for three years, on condition that the appellant is not convicted of stock theft during the period of suspension.