M.K and Another v S (A312/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 439 (8 May 2025)

M.K and Another v S (A312/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 439 (8 May 2025)

The court found that the applicants, convicted of serious offences against a minor and sentenced to lengthy imprisonment, failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail pending reconsideration by the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Their previous compliance with bail conditions and lack of prior convictions were noted but did not outweigh the risk of abscondment, especially after experiencing prison life and facing the prospect of a long sentence. The interests of justice, including the safety of the complainant and the seriousness of the offences, were paramount. The court held that the applicants did not meet the threshold required by section...

Citation
[2025] ZAGPPHC 439
Parties
Applicant: M[...] K[...]; Respondent: The State
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
8 May 2025
Case Number
A312/2022
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Bail Pending Reconsideration of SCA Decision
Outcome
Application for bail pending reconsideration to the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal is refused.
Judges
Mosopa
Legal Topics
Bail Pending Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Flight Risk, Criminal Procedure Act Section 60, Prison Conditions
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Bail Pending Appeal Exceptional Circumstances Flight Risk Criminal Procedure Act Section 60 Prison Conditions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M[...] K[...]

Applicant

The State

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Bail Pending Reconsideration of SCA Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have established exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail pending reconsideration by the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants pose a flight risk given their recent experience of imprisonment and the prospect of lengthy sentences.
  3. 3 Whether the interests of justice and the safety of the complainant permit the applicants' release on bail.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, convicted of serious offences against a minor and sentenced to lengthy imprisonment, failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail pending reconsideration by the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Their previous compliance with bail conditions and lack of prior convictions were noted but did not outweigh the risk of abscondment, especially after experiencing prison life and facing the prospect of a long sentence. The interests of justice, including the safety of the complainant and the seriousness of the offences, were paramount. The court held that the applicants did not meet the threshold required by section...

Court Disposition

Application for bail pending reconsideration to the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal is refused.

Orders

  • The application for the release of the applicants on bail pending the finalisation of the application for reconsideration to the President of the Supreme Court of Appeal, in terms of section 17(2)(f) of Act 10 of 2013, is refused.