Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
7 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZAMPMHC 33

Janse Van Rensburg v S (Bail Appeal) (BA02/2025; SA158/2024)

Janse Van Rensburg v S (Bail Appeal) (BA02/2025; SA158/2024) [2025] ZAMPMHC 33 (23 June 2025)

The High Court dismissed a bail appeal, finding the appellant failed to show the interests of justice permitted release and remained a flight risk.

  • Bail Application
  • Flight Risk
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPJHC 545

Mashego v S (A31/2025)

Mashego v S (A31/2025) [2025] ZAGPJHC 545 (4 June 2025)

Appeal against refusal of bail dismissed. The High Court held the appellant failed to prove exceptional circumstances under section 60(11)(a).

  • Bail Application
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Balance Of Probabilities
  • Flight Risk
  • Previous Convictions
  • Bail-application
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAWCHC 216

R.B and Another v S (Bail Appeal) (A74/2024)

R.B and Another v S (Bail Appeal) (A74/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 216 (23 May 2025)

The court found that the magistrate misdirected herself by failing to properly consider the evidence presented by the appellants regarding the weakness of the state case and the existence of exceptional circumstances. The magistrate did not objectively assess whether the state case was so weak as to justify bail, instead making findings of fact on contested charges. The evidence showed that the appellants were not flight risks, as they returned to South Africa to face charges despite having the opportunity to remain abroad. The interests of justice, including the best interests of the minor c…

  • Bail Application
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Flight Risk
  • Child Care And Protection
  • Sexual Offences
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 509

Ilunga v S (Bail Appeal) (A74/2025)

Ilunga v S (Bail Appeal) (A74/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 509 (19 May 2025)

Bail appeal dismissed where the appellant failed to place evidence before the magistrate to show exceptional circumstances or answer the section 60 bail criteria.

  • Bail Application
  • Flight Risk
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Immigration Status
  • Refugee Act Interpretation
  • Bail-application
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 439

M.K and Another v S (A312/2022)

M.K and Another v S (A312/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 439 (8 May 2025)

The High Court refused bail pending reconsideration by the SCA President, finding that two convicted applicants failed to show exceptional circumstances.

  • Bail Pending Appeal
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Flight Risk
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 60
  • Prison Conditions
  • Bail-pending-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZALMPPHC 49

Botha v S (Bail Appeal) (BA 03/2025)

Botha v S (Bail Appeal) (BA 03/2025) [2025] ZALMPPHC 49 (19 March 2025)

High Court bail appeal upheld after finding the magistrate misdirected itself on flight risk and irrelevant considerations; bail granted with conditions.

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offences
  • Flight Risk
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Drug Trafficking
  • Money Laundering
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPJHC 496

Singh v S (A106/2024)

Singh v S (A106/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 496 (19 March 2025)

The High Court dismissed Rushil Singh’s bail appeal on new facts, finding the alleged new material did not justify release and that he remained a flight risk.

  • Bail Application
  • Fraud
  • Forgery
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Flight Risk
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZANWHC 143

Mpofu v S (Bail Appeal) (CAB2/2025)

Mpofu v S (Bail Appeal) (CAB2/2025) [2025] ZANWHC 143 (10 March 2025)

The court held that the magistrate did not err in refusing bail. The applicant failed to establish sufficient family, emotional, or community ties to South Africa, did not provide satisfactory evidence regarding his assets or employment prospects, and admitted possession of a fraudulent permanent residence permit. The seriousness of the charges and the lack of valid documentation increased the risk of absconding. The applicant's arguments regarding previous cooperation and withdrawal of charges in Pretoria did not outweigh the concerns about flight risk. The court found no misdirection by the…

  • Bail Application
  • Flight Risk
  • Schedule 5 Offences
  • Fraud
  • Immigration Status
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAECMHC 13

Mkhangeli v S (CC130/10)

Mkhangeli v S (CC130/10) [2025] ZAECMHC 13 (5 March 2025)

The High Court dismissed a bail pending appeal application, finding no exceptional circumstances and a risk of absconding, despite missing parts of the trial record.

  • Bail Pending Appeal
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Flight Risk
  • Record Reconstruction
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Bail-pending-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 201

Sibanyoni v S (A323/24)

Sibanyoni v S (A323/24) [2025] ZAGPPHC 201 (25 February 2025)

The court held that the appellant failed to establish exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail pending appeal as required by section 60(11)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. While being granted leave to appeal is an important consideration, it is not sufficient on its own to warrant bail. The appellant's previous abscondment, the seriousness of the offences, and the lengthy sentence imposed significantly increased the risk of flight. The court found no basis to interfere with the magistrate's exercise of discretion in refusing bail, as the appellant did not meet the statutory requ…

  • Bail Pending Appeal
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Flight Risk
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 60
  • Sentencing Principles
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.