National Credit Regulator v Botshabelo Cash Loans CC (NCT/321451/2024/57(1)) [2024] ZANCT 48 (3 October 2024)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to provide prescribed documentation, charging excessive interest, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, and not maintaining required records. The respondent's conduct amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA. The Tribunal rejected the respondent's argument regarding the necessity of a compliance notice, holding that section 55(1) is discretionary. The respondent's lack of awareness and training did not excuse its obligations as a registered credit provider. The seriousness, duration, and gravity of the...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANCT 48
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Botshabelo Cash Loans CC
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 October 2024
- Case Number
- NCT/321451/2024/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Cancellation Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed.
- Judges
- C Sassman, S Hockey, MC Peenze
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Interest Rate Regulation, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Botshabelo Cash Loans CC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Cancellation Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations.
- 2 Whether the respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA.
- 3 Whether cancellation of the respondent's registration as a credit provider is justified.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to provide prescribed documentation, charging excessive interest, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, and not maintaining required records. The respondent's conduct amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA. The Tribunal rejected the respondent's argument regarding the necessity of a compliance notice, holding that section 55(1) is discretionary. The respondent's lack of awareness and training did not excuse its obligations as a registered credit provider. The seriousness, duration, and gravity of the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed.
Orders
- The respondent is found to have contravened specified provisions of the NCA, its regulations, and general conditions of registration.
- The respondent's conduct is declared prohibited conduct under section 150(a).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment