National Credit Regulator v Botshabelo Cash Loans CC (NCT/321451/2024/57(1)) [2024] ZANCT 48 (3 October 2024)

National Credit Regulator v Botshabelo Cash Loans CC (NCT/321451/2024/57(1)) [2024] ZANCT 48 (3 October 2024)

The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to provide prescribed documentation, charging excessive interest, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, and not maintaining required records. The respondent's conduct amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA. The Tribunal rejected the respondent's argument regarding the necessity of a compliance notice, holding that section 55(1) is discretionary. The respondent's lack of awareness and training did not excuse its obligations as a registered credit provider. The seriousness, duration, and gravity of the...

Citation
[2024] ZANCT 48
Parties
Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Botshabelo Cash Loans CC
Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
3 October 2024
Case Number
NCT/321451/2024/57(1)
Procedural Posture
Cancellation Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed.
Judges
C Sassman, S Hockey, MC Peenze
Legal Topics
National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Interest Rate Regulation, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Credit Provider Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Credit Regulator

Applicant

Botshabelo Cash Loans CC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cancellation Application / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its regulations.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA.
  3. 3 Whether cancellation of the respondent's registration as a credit provider is justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened multiple provisions of the National Credit Act and its regulations, including failing to provide prescribed documentation, charging excessive interest, failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, and not maintaining required records. The respondent's conduct amounted to prohibited conduct under section 150(a) of the NCA. The Tribunal rejected the respondent's argument regarding the necessity of a compliance notice, holding that section 55(1) is discretionary. The respondent's lack of awareness and training did not excuse its obligations as a registered credit provider. The seriousness, duration, and gravity of the...

Court Disposition

Application granted. Respondent's registration as a credit provider cancelled. Administrative fine imposed.

Orders

  • The respondent is found to have contravened specified provisions of the NCA, its regulations, and general conditions of registration.
  • The respondent's conduct is declared prohibited conduct under section 150(a).