National Credit Regulator v Veloz Cash Loans (Pty) Ltd (NCT/214107/2022/57(1)) [2022] ZANCT 17 (12 March 2022)
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, entering into reckless credit agreements, issuing credit agreements not in the prescribed form, charging excessive interest and prohibited fees, and including unlawful provisions in its agreements. The respondent failed to oppose the application or provide any defence. The evidence from sampled consumer files and the investigation report demonstrated systemic disregard for statutory requirements and consumer rights. The Tribunal held that these contraventions were serious, affected vulnerable consumers, and brought the consumer...
- Citation
- [2022] ZANCT 17
- Parties
- Applicant: National Credit Regulator; Respondent: Veloz Cash Loans (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2022
- Case Number
- NCT/214107/2022/57(1)
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Application
- Outcome
- Application granted. Respondent declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct and repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and Regulations. Administrative fine imposed. Sampled agreements declared reckless and set aside. Further remedial orders granted.
- Judges
- P A Beck, M Peenze, F Sibanda
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Reckless Lending, Affordability Assessment, Administrative Fine, Unlawful Contract Terms, Statutory Reporting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
National Credit Regulator
Applicant
Veloz Cash Loans (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Application / Default Judgment After Unopposed Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations.
- 2 Whether the respondent engaged in prohibited conduct by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, issuing unlawful credit agreements, and charging prohibited fees.
- 3 Whether the Tribunal should impose an administrative fine and grant further remedial orders.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and its Regulations by failing to conduct proper affordability assessments, entering into reckless credit agreements, issuing credit agreements not in the prescribed form, charging excessive interest and prohibited fees, and including unlawful provisions in its agreements. The respondent failed to oppose the application or provide any defence. The evidence from sampled consumer files and the investigation report demonstrated systemic disregard for statutory requirements and consumer rights. The Tribunal held that these contraventions were serious, affected vulnerable consumers, and brought the consumer...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Respondent declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct and repeatedly contravened the National Credit Act and Regulations. Administrative fine imposed. Sampled agreements declared reckless and set aside. Further remedial orders granted.
Orders
- The respondent is declared to have engaged in prohibited conduct by repeatedly contravening the National Credit Act, Regulations, and conditions of registration.
- The respondent is interdicted from engaging in prohibited conduct in the future.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment