S v Khosa (A 224/14) [2014] ZAGPPHC 398 (28 March 2014)

S v Khosa (A 224/14) [2014] ZAGPPHC 398 (28 March 2014)

The court found that, since the record of the complainant's evidence was preserved and the remainder of the record was destroyed by fire, justice required that only the evidence led after the complainant's testimony be set aside. The complainant's evidence would stand, and the trial should proceed from that point. This approach ensures fairness to both parties and avoids unnecessary repetition of testimony, while remedying the procedural defect caused by the loss of the record.

Citation
[2014] ZAGPPHC 398
Parties
Applicant: The State; Respondent: Lesley Khosa
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 March 2014
Case Number
A 224/14
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Special Review Following Destruction of Record
Outcome
Evidence led after the complainant's testimony is set aside; the complainant's evidence stands; the case is referred back to the magistrate to proceed with the trial.
Judges
A A Louw, N Janse Van Nieuwenhuizen
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Trial Procedure, Record Reconstruction, Evidence Exclusion
Criminal Law Sexual Assault Trial Procedure Record Reconstruction Evidence Exclusion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The State

Applicant

Lesley Khosa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Special Review Following Destruction of Record

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should evidence led after the complainant's testimony be set aside due to the destruction of the record?
  2. 2 Is it necessary for the complainant to testify again?
  3. 3 How should the trial proceed in light of the missing record?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, since the record of the complainant's evidence was preserved and the remainder of the record was destroyed by fire, justice required that only the evidence led after the complainant's testimony be set aside. The complainant's evidence would stand, and the trial should proceed from that point. This approach ensures fairness to both parties and avoids unnecessary repetition of testimony, while remedying the procedural defect caused by the loss of the record.

Court Disposition

Evidence led after the complainant's testimony is set aside; the complainant's evidence stands; the case is referred back to the magistrate to proceed with the trial.

Orders

  • Any evidence led after that of the complainant is set aside.
  • The evidence of the complainant will stand.