Total South Africa (Pty) Ltd. v Bekker NO (261/90) [1991] ZASCA 183; 1992 (1) SA 617 (AD); [1992] 4 All SA 98 (AD) (28 November 1991)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Van Vuuren was not a party to the agreement between Total and Fourie, nor was there a stipulatio alteri in his favour, as neither the agreement nor the affidavits disclosed any intention or acceptance of benefit by Van Vuuren. The agreement constituted a conditional pactum de non petendo, whereby Total undertook not to proceed against Van Vuuren only if Fourie performed his obligations punctually. Upon Fourie's breach, the condition failed and Total's undertaking lapsed, entitling it to pursue remedies against both Fourie and Van Vuuren. The remedies were not inconsistent, and no election or waiver occurred. The Court a quo erred in finding otherwise,...
- Citation
- [1991] ZASCA 183
- Parties
- Appellant: Total South Africa (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Jacobus Nicholas Bekker N O
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 1991
- Case Number
- 261/90
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Bench of Transvaal Provincial Division; Special Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld with costs, including costs of two counsel. The order of the Court a quo is set aside and substituted with dismissal of Van Vuuren's application with costs.
- Judges
- Joubert, Hefer, Smalberger, Eksteen, Nicholas
- Legal Topics
- Contract Interpretation, Stipulatio Alteri, Pactum De Non Petendo, Waiver and Election
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Total South Africa (Pty) Limited
Appellant
Jacobus Nicholas Bekker N O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Full Bench of Transvaal Provincial Division; Special Leave Granted by Supreme Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Van Vuuren acquired rights under the agreement between Total and Fourie.
- 2 Whether the terms of the agreement or conduct of Total released Van Vuuren from his indebtedness under the settlement order.
- 3 Whether Total was obliged to elect between remedies against Fourie and Van Vuuren or could pursue both.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Van Vuuren was not a party to the agreement between Total and Fourie, nor was there a stipulatio alteri in his favour, as neither the agreement nor the affidavits disclosed any intention or acceptance of benefit by Van Vuuren. The agreement constituted a conditional pactum de non petendo, whereby Total undertook not to proceed against Van Vuuren only if Fourie performed his obligations punctually. Upon Fourie's breach, the condition failed and Total's undertaking lapsed, entitling it to pursue remedies against both Fourie and Van Vuuren. The remedies were not inconsistent, and no election or waiver occurred. The Court a quo erred in finding otherwise,...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld with costs, including costs of two counsel. The order of the Court a quo is set aside and substituted with dismissal of Van Vuuren's application with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- The order of the Court a quo is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment