Teichmann Structures (Pty) Ltd v Hollard Insurance Company Ltd and Another (24233/18) [2018] ZAGPJHC 569 (19 October 2018)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
24233/18
Judge
Carrim
The applicant failed to prove that the outstanding amount of R2,129,876.62 was unrelated to the Advance Payment Guarantee and instead linked to an unsecured loan. The documents relied upon by the applicant, including IPC 13 and De Waal's email, did not support its version when read in context. The evidence showed that all advance payments were treated the same and recouped under the contract, with no distinction between secured and unsecured advances. The applicant's reliance on selective documentation and failure to provide proof of implementation of IPC 13 undermined its case. The court fou…
Basil Read (Pty) Ltd v Nedbank Ltd and Another (8283/12) [2012] ZAGPJHC 101; 2012 (6) SA 514 (GSJ) (13 April 2012)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
8283/12
Judge
Saldulker
The court found that the applicant failed to join the opposing party and did not provide for service of the application or order, despite the order directly affecting the opposing party's rights. The applicant's attempt to supplement its founding affidavit was refused, as the authorities do not permit supplementation in a Rule 6(12)(c) reconsideration by the applicant. The court held that the advance payment guarantees created independent contractual obligations for the bank to pay the beneficiary, and that disputes between the applicant's subsidiary and the opposing party were irrelevant to…