J.M.M v S (CA 28/2023) [2023] ZANWHC 240 (19 December 2023)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
CA 28/2023
Judges
Petersen, Khan
Criminal appeal against a 36-year effective rape sentence dismissed. The court found no substantial and compelling circumstances and no basis to interfere.
Mahlangu v S (A176/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 269 (10 July 2023)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A176/2022
Judges
Reinders, Berry
The High Court dismissed an appeal against convictions for kidnapping and rape, finding the complainant’s evidence was properly corroborated and the sentences justified.
Lungisa v S (696/2019) [2020] ZASCA 99; 2021 (1) SACR 1 (SCA) (9 September 2020)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
696/2019
Judges
Maya P, Dambuza JA, Nicholls JA, Weiner AJA, Mabindla-Boqwana AJA
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed Andile Lungisa’s sentence appeal, upholding an effective two-year prison term for assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.
Jantjies v S (A273/19) [2020] ZAWCHC 32 (9 March 2020)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A273/19
Judges
Mabindla-Boqwana, Mayosi
The High Court dismissed Michael Jantjies’s appeal against three rape convictions, holding that the complainant’s single-witness evidence was credible and reliable.
Singhapi v S (A81/2019) [2019] ZAFSHC 104 (11 June 2019)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A81/2019
Judge
Morobane, AJ
The court held that the appellant failed to discharge the onus of proving exceptional circumstances as required by section 60(11)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The reasons advanced by the appellant, including his employment, family responsibilities, and assurance not to abscond, were not considered exceptional in the context of the evidence presented. The magistrate did not err in his assessment, nor did he place undue emphasis on community trust or the strength of the State's case. Accordingly, the appeal against the refusal of bail was dismissed.
The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal against conviction and life imprisonment for raping a 10-year-old child, finding no substantial and compelling circumstances.
Pettenburger-Perwald and Another v Bayport Financial Services (Pty) Ltd and Others (NCT/10293/2013/148(1)P) [2013] ZANCT 60 (11 December 2013)
Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Case number
NCT/10293/2013/148(1)P
Judges
J Maseko, F Manamela, H Devraj
The National Consumer Tribunal dismissed an appeal against refusal to confirm a debt re-arrangement agreement because the appellants did not comply with procedural rules and did not appear.
Ethekwini Municipality v South African Municipality Workers Union and Others (442/2011) [2013] ZASCA 135 (27 September 2013)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
442/2011
Judges
Ponnan, Cachalia, Leach, Majiedt, Willis
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed this labour appeal as moot under section 21A, holding that the expired agreement meant no practical effect could follow.