Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
7 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 1016

Sir Isaac Newton School NPO v Hoek Plein Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (2021/10445)

Sir Isaac Newton School NPO v Hoek Plein Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (2021/10445) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1016 (8 October 2024)

The court dismissed an urgent application to lift attachment of an FNB bank account, finding the NPO had not proved it owned the account.

  • Interdictory Relief
  • Ownership Of Bank Account
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Interdictory-relief
  • Bank-account-ownership
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 762

J.M v N.C (2023/00100)

J.M v N.C (2023/00100) [2024] ZAGPJHC 762 (16 August 2024)

The court found that the respondent failed to provide credible evidence of domicile or residence in South Africa. Her assertions were unsupported, contradicted by her own communications, and lacked necessary detail regarding her employment, marital status, and family circumstances. The redacted visa did not substantiate her claim of temporary residence in the USA, and her failure to disclose relevant facts undermined her credibility. The applicant discharged the burden of proving that the respondent is not an incola of South Africa, and thus a peregrinus. The reconsideration application was d…

  • Jurisdiction
  • Peregrinus
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Reconsideration Application
  • Domicile
  • Legal Fees Claim
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAFSHC 493

Sheriff, Bloemfontein West v Majiedt N.O and Another (1935/2021)

Sheriff, Bloemfontein West v Majiedt N.O and Another (1935/2021) [2023] ZAFSHC 493 (21 December 2023)

In an interpleader dispute, the court held that the Trust failed to rebut the presumption that movables in the debtor’s possession belonged to him.

  • Presumption Of Ownership
  • Interpleader Proceedings
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Trust Property
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Interpleader-proceedings
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2021] ZAFSHC 218

Meyer and Another v Van Der Riet (1656/2021)

Meyer and Another v Van Der Riet (1656/2021) [2021] ZAFSHC 218 (13 September 2021)

The High Court issued a rule nisi and interim attachment to secure a debt under a notarial bond, but refused to authorize sale of the assets while no amount was due under the AOD.

  • Notarial Bond Perfection
  • Security Rights
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Breach Of Bond Terms
  • Notarial-bond-perfection
  • Attachment-of-assets
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2020] ZAECGHC 59

Amathole District Municipality v Kepe Lodge CC (459/2019)

Amathole District Municipality v Kepe Lodge CC (459/2019) [2020] ZAECGHC 59 (9 June 2020)

The High Court dismissed a municipality’s bid to recover movable assets from its lessor, finding disputable facts and a magistrates’ court attachment order.

  • Lease Agreement
  • Unlawful Detention Of Property
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Municipal Structures Act
  • Lease-agreement
  • Motion-proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2017] ZANWHC 126

Du Preez N.O and Others v Goudini Chrome (Pty) Ltd and Another (M297/2016)

Du Preez N.O and Others v Goudini Chrome (Pty) Ltd and Another (M297/2016) [2017] ZANWHC 126 (1 September 2017)

The High Court refused leave to appeal, finding the order was interim, not final, and that there were no reasonable prospects of success.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Ownership Dispute
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Leave-to-appeal
  • Interim-interdict
  • Ownership-dispute
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAGPJHC 63

Sheriff, Johannesburg East v Vally; In re: Formeset Printers (Pty) Ltd v Vally (24163/2007)

Sheriff, Johannesburg East v Vally; In re: Formeset Printers (Pty) Ltd v Vally (24163/2007) [2016] ZAGPJHC 63 (24 March 2016)

The court dismissed an interpleader claim and held that a close corporation member’s interest remained attachable because ownership changed only on CIPC registration.

  • Interpleader Proceedings
  • Close Corporation Membership
  • Pledge Of Movable Property
  • Execution Of Judgment
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Interpleader-proceedings
Read case analysis
Banking And Finance [2010] ZASCA 53

South African Reserve Bank v Khumalo and Another (235/09)

South African Reserve Bank v Khumalo and Another (235/09) [2010] ZASCA 53; 2010 (5) SA 449 (SCA) ; [2011] 1 All SA 26 (SCA) (31 March 2010)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the omission of a time limit in Regulation 22C(1) does not render the regulation invalid. The empowering statute, section 9(2)(g) of the Currency and Exchanges Act, sets a statutory maximum period for attachment, which applies regardless of whether the regulation or the notice expressly states it. The regulations must be interpreted in light of the statute, and the attachment cannot endure beyond the statutory limit. The court found that the President was not required to reiterate the time limit in the regulations, and the absence of such a provision does…

  • Exchange Control Regulations
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Currency And Exchanges Act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2009] ZAGPPHC 273

Georgia Avenue Investments 11 (Pty) Ltd v Koperfontein Meule (Pty) Ltd and Others (55263/2008)

Georgia Avenue Investments 11 (Pty) Ltd v Koperfontein Meule (Pty) Ltd and Others (55263/2008) [2009] ZAGPPHC 273 (5 August 2009)

The court stayed execution of a default judgment and ordered release of attached assets pending a rescission application, finding good prospects of success and likely injustice.

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Stay-of-execution
  • Rescission-of-judgment
  • Attachment-of-assets
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2007] ZAGPHC 98

Maigret (Pty) Ltd v Buys NO and Others (40331/2006)

Maigret (Pty) Ltd v Buys NO and Others (40331/2006) [2007] ZAGPHC 98 (14 June 2007)

The High Court struck the urgent application off the roll, finding Maigret (Pty) Ltd had not shown sufficient urgency to challenge or stay execution.

  • Warrant Of Execution
  • Stay Of Execution
  • Urgency
  • Arbitration Award
  • Attachment Of Assets
  • Urgent-application
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.