Van Zyl v Wilson and Another (5772/2015) [2015] ZAECGHC 140 (4 December 2015)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
5772/2015
Judge
J.D. Pickering
The court ordered disclosure of trust account details and proof of payment so the applicant could pursue an anti-dissipation interdict over sale proceeds.
Wishart and Others v Blieden NO and Others (7136/2011) [2012] ZAKZPHC 72; [2013] 1 All SA 485 (KZP); 2013 (6) SA 59 (KZP) (15 November 2012)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
7136/2011
Judge
Gorven
The court found that the applicants failed to establish a clear right to the relief sought. No attorney-client contract existed between the applicants and the respondents; any such relationship was with the companies. The applicants did not prove that confidential information personal to them was imparted to the respondents. The information disclosed related to the companies and was either public or not relevant to the section 417 enquiry. The court declined to develop South African law to adopt the inherent jurisdiction approach as in Australian law, finding that the facts did not warrant su…
Bogoshi v Van Vuuren NO and Others; Bogoshi and Another v Director: Office for Serious Economic Offences (543/93) [1995] ZASCA 125; 1996 (1) SA 785 (SCA); (13 November 1995)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
543/93
Judges
Corbett, Nestadt, Vivier, Harms, Olivier
The court held that attorneys could not block seizure of files under the Serious Economic Offences Act by claiming privilege that was not bona fide.