Molefe v Nedcor Bank Limited and Others (99/754)
Molefe v Nedcor Bank Limited and Others (99/754) [2023] ZAGPJHC 20 (12 January 2023)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide a reasonable and plausible explanation for his default and the extensive delay in bringing the rescission application, which was filed twenty-two years after the default judgment. The applicant's version was contradicted by documentary evidence and affidavits, and he failed to establish a bona fide or prima facie defence. The court held that service of summons was properly effected at the applicant's chosen domicilium, and Nedcor Bank was entitled to judgment and sale in execution. The applicant's reliance on Rule 42(1)(a) and the common la…
Source excerpt
- Rescission Of Judgment
- Condonation
- Sale In Execution
- Bond Enforcement
- Service At Domicilium
- Ownership Dispute