Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 669

N.P.K. v K.A.K (2020/15202; 2024/023432)

N.P.K. v K.A.K (2020/15202; 2024/023432) [2025] ZAGPJHC 669 (11 July 2025)

The High Court dismissed an application to reconsider a hearing date set by the Deputy Judge President, finding no factual or procedural basis to interfere.

  • Case Management
  • Hearing Scheduling
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Case-management
  • Hearing-scheduling
  • Judicial-discretion
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 549

Feltre Trust and Others v Middelvlei Tenacres Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/019326)

Feltre Trust and Others v Middelvlei Tenacres Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/019326) [2025] ZAGPJHC 549 (26 May 2025)

The court found that the failure to attach the trustee resolution to the sale agreement or founding affidavit did not render the contract void, as the resolution was executed prior to the agreement and authority was not challenged until later. The agreement was validly concluded and cancelled, and the penalty clause invoked the Conventional Penalties Act, making proportionality a live issue. The referral to oral evidence on proportionality was within the court's discretion under Rule 6(5)(g) and did not violate the functus officio doctrine, as it was an interlocutory order. The respondents' c…

  • Alienation Of Land Act
  • Conventional Penalties Act
  • Contract Cancellation
  • Authority Of Trustees
  • Case Management
  • Oral Evidence Referral
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2025] ZAGPPHC 513

Langa v Minister of Correctional Services (2025/030684)

Langa v Minister of Correctional Services (2025/030684) [2025] ZAGPPHC 513 (26 May 2025)

The court held that, except in exceptional circumstances, it is inappropriate to remove a lay litigant's urgent application from the roll without first ascertaining the nature of the complaint and determining its urgency. In cases involving incarcerated individuals, the court must exercise heightened scrutiny due to the vulnerability of applicants and the seriousness of claims relating to liberty or detention conditions. The absence of any response from the Minister of Correctional Services was found to be unacceptable, and the Department's failure to facilitate the applicants' attendance at…

  • Right To Liberty
  • Parole Eligibility
  • Urgent Application Procedure
  • Case Management
  • Judicial Supervision
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAMPMBHC 37

NAD Property Income Fund (Pty) Ltd and Another v Tivane and Others (2692/2022)

NAD Property Income Fund (Pty) Ltd and Another v Tivane and Others (2692/2022) [2025] ZAMPMBHC 37 (12 May 2025)

The High Court refused to uplift an interim interdict stopping a petrol filling station pending review and ordered attorney-and-client costs against the respondents.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Review Application
  • Good Cause
  • Case Management
  • Attorney And Client Costs
  • Interim-interdict
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 308

Nedbank Limited v Ntshangase (2022/027021)

Nedbank Limited v Ntshangase (2022/027021) [2025] ZAGPJHC 308 (19 March 2025)

The High Court postponed a summary judgment application sine die because a related condonation application was not ready for hearing, with no costs order.

  • Summary Judgment
  • Condonation
  • Uniform Rules Of Court
  • Costs Order
  • Case Management
  • Summary-judgment
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAECELLC 2

ABSA Bank v Murray (EL 1130/2013)

ABSA Bank v Murray (EL 1130/2013) [2025] ZAECELLC 2 (4 February 2025)

The court set aside an amended plea as irregular for failing to follow Uniform Rule 28, and directed the plaintiff to regularise its pleadings first.

  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Withdrawal Of Admissions
  • Uniform Rule 28
  • Uniform Rule 30
  • Costs Orders
  • Case Management
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAWCHC 403

Road Accident Fund v Advocate Botha N.O (4933/2021)

Road Accident Fund v Advocate Botha N.O (4933/2021) [2024] ZAWCHC 403 (29 November 2024)

The court found that the Defendant failed to bring a substantive application for repudiation of the joint minute as required by both case management directives and binding authority. The application was irregular, procedurally defective, and lacking in substantive justification. The Defendant's reliance on Rule 36 was misplaced, as the notice served was non-compliant and the patient had already undergone multiple expert assessments. The court affirmed that joint minutes between experts are binding unless repudiation is properly and timeously raised and granted on good cause shown. The Defenda…

  • Expert Evidence
  • Joint Minutes
  • Repudiation Of Expert Agreement
  • Case Management
  • Rule 36 Medical Examination
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2024] ZAGPJHC 1219

Association of Regional Magistrates of Southern Africa v Independent Commission for Remuneration of Public Office and Others (28644/2024)

Association of Regional Magistrates of Southern Africa v Independent Commission for Remuneration of Public Office and Others (28644/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1219 (26 November 2024)

The High Court awarded the applicant costs on prayer 2 up to 16 October 2024, finding it had achieved substantial success; the remaining costs were each party’s own.

  • Judicial Remuneration
  • Mootness
  • Costs Award
  • Statutory Duties
  • Case Management
  • Costs-award
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2024] ZAGPJHC 1235

Association of Regional Magistrates of Southern Africa v Independent Commission for Remuneration of Public Office Bearers and Others (28644/2024)

Association of Regional Magistrates of Southern Africa v Independent Commission for Remuneration of Public Office Bearers and Others (28644/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1235 (26 November 2024)

The High Court held the applicant had substantial success on costs in relation to delayed remuneration recommendations, but limited costs to 16 October 2024 because the relief later became moot.

  • Judicial Remuneration
  • Mootness
  • Costs Award
  • Statutory Duties
  • Case Management
  • Costs-award
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 1016

Mphaka v Road Accident Fund (1809/2022)

Mphaka v Road Accident Fund (1809/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1016 (14 October 2024)

The High Court postponed a default judgment application, giving the defendant and state attorney a final chance to answer a challenge to a late notice of intention to defend.

  • Notice Of Intention To Defend
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Costs De Bonis Propriis
  • Case Management
  • Notice-of-intention-to-defend
  • Default-judgment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.