A R v S S and Another (2019/8877)
A R v S S and Another (2019/8877) [2019] ZAGPJHC 98 (25 March 2019)
An urgent grandmother-access application was dismissed where urgency was not properly proved, the alleged removal risk was unsubstantiated, and the relief was held intrusive.
- Child Access
- Urgent Interdict
- Abuse Of Process
- Attorney And Client Costs
- Child-access
- Urgent-applications