Sayers v Snaid and Morris Incorporated (130616/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 665 (8 July 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
130616/2023
Judge
Engelbrecht
The High Court granted a final winding-up order, finding the respondent unlawfully misrepresented liability for fees and pursued inflated execution against a creditor.
African Woman Co-Ordinated Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others v Gauteng African Women Alliance (Pty) Ltd (2018/41434) [2025] ZAGPJHC 28 (17 January 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2018/41434
Judge
L.T. Modiba
The court found that the applicants failed to establish that the respondent's action was vexatious, reckless, or an abuse of process. The core dispute regarding the respondent's shareholding and the validity of the AWCI resolution is highly contested and must be determined at trial. The applicants did not justify the amount sought for security, nor did they explain the delay in bringing the application when the matter was nearly trial ready. The respondent's precarious financial position alone does not warrant an order for security for costs, as the right to litigate under section 34 of the C…
PT Paint and Palel (Pty) Ltd and Another v Verios and Others (2024/084378) [2024] ZAGPJHC 807 (16 August 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2024/084378
Judge
Modiba
The High Court heard an urgent corporate dispute about director appointments, share-transfer-related control, and bank signatory authority, and granted interim relief.
Preference Capital (Pty) Ltd v Nomageba Trading CC and Others (2024/031809) [2024] ZAGPPHC 419 (8 May 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
2024/031809
Judge
Labuschagne AJ
The High Court set aside a company’s business rescue resolution and ordered provisional winding-up, finding no reasonable prospect of rescue and procedural non-compliance.
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that section 218(2) of the Companies Act does not create a general right of action against directors for losses suffered by creditors due to reckless trading by the company. Section 22(1) imposes duties on the company, not its directors, and liability for directors is specifically regulated by section 77(3)(b), which provides for liability to the company itself. The appellant failed to identify any provision of the Act breached by the directors that would trigger liability under section 218(2). The Court rejected the reasoning in Rabinowitz and related cases,…
Member of the Executive Council: Northern Cape Department of Agriculture, Environmental Affairs, Rural Development and Land Reform v Bester N.O and Others (1793/2022) [2024] ZANCHC 92 (15 April 2024)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
1793/2022
Judge
Williams
The Department failed to establish on a balance of probabilities that Bester was incompetent or failed to perform his duties as business rescue practitioner under section 139(2)(a) and (b) of the Companies Act. The complaints regarding additional tea supply agreements, prejudicial commercial terms, unaffordable loans, and failure to report were either unsubstantiated, based on hearsay, or adequately explained by Bester. The amended business rescue plan was validly adopted by unanimous creditor vote, as permitted by the plan itself. The failure to report to court and misunderstanding of contra…
Van Zyl and Others v NTC Global Trade Fund (Pty) Ltd and Others (129789/23) [2024] ZAGPPHC 68 (30 January 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
129789/23
Judge
Leso
The court dismissed an urgent application to provisionally liquidate NTC Global Trade Fund, finding no proven insolvency and noting POCA preservation restraints.