Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2024] ZALMPPHC 26

Phori v S (A30/2022)

Phori v S (A30/2022) [2024] ZALMPPHC 26 (13 March 2024)

The High Court confirmed convictions on two rape counts but set aside life imprisonment, replacing it with 22 years’ imprisonment on each count to run concurrently.

  • Rape
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Consent Defence
  • Single Witness Evidence
  • Appeal On Sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2020] ZAGPPHC 356

Matsie v S (A202/18)

Matsie v S (A202/18) [2020] ZAGPPHC 356 (14 July 2020)

The court found that the reconstructed record was adequate for the proper consideration of the appeal, with any defects being minor and not prejudicial. The complainant's evidence was credible, consistent, and corroborated by other witnesses and medical evidence. The appellant's version of consensual intercourse was unconvincing, inconsistent, and lacked corroboration, with significant details not put to the complainant during cross-examination. The appellant's prior conviction for rape and the circumstances of the offence justified the sentence imposed. The court concluded that there was no…

  • Rape
  • Single Witness Cautionary Rule
  • Record Reconstruction
  • Credibility Assessment
  • Consent Defence
  • Sentencing Guidelines
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZAGPPHC 1290

Shai v S (A320/16)

Shai v S (A320/16) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1290 (15 December 2017)

The court found that the appellant's convictions for rape and robbery were supported by credible evidence, including DNA links and consistent witness testimony. The defence of consent was rejected as the complainants' submission to sexual intercourse was induced by threats, violence, and the use of weapons, which cannot amount to consent. The trial court materially misdirected itself by imposing life sentences for rape where statutory requirements were not met, as none of the complainants were minors, raped more than once, or by multiple perpetrators. The sentences for rape were substituted w…

  • Rape
  • Robbery With Aggravating Circumstances
  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Consent Defence
  • Dna Evidence
  • Appeal Procedure
Read case analysis
Delict [2011] ZAGPJHC 56

Kumalo v Cycle Lab (Pty) Ltd (31871/2008)

Kumalo v Cycle Lab (Pty) Ltd (31871/2008) [2011] ZAGPJHC 56 (17 June 2011)

High Court held that using Julia Basetsana Kumalo’s photo in advertising without consent constituted iniuria. Damages were left for later determination.

  • Actio Iniuriarum
  • Personality Rights
  • Image Rights
  • Privacy Infringement
  • Sentimental Damages
  • Consent Defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1994] ZASCA 99

S v Kruger (298/93)

S v Kruger (298/93) [1994] ZASCA 99 (19 August 1994)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed a rape conviction appeal, holding that the complainant’s evidence was credible despite criticism and that the sentence was not excessive.

  • Rape
  • Single Witness Rule
  • Credibility Assessment
  • Consent Defence
  • Consent-defence
  • Single-witness-rule
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.