Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2021] ZACC 27

RAiN Chartered Accountants Incorporated v South African Social Security Agency (CCT 48/17)

RAiN Chartered Accountants Incorporated v South African Social Security Agency (CCT 48/17) [2021] ZACC 27; 2021 (11) BCLR 1225 (CC) (10 September 2021)

The Constitutional Court held that SASSA must pay reasonable fees for RAiN’s further work under the April 2021 order and consider appointing RAiN under a deviation process.

  • Public Procurement
  • Estoppel
  • Treasury Regulations
  • Constitutional Principles
  • Professional Fees
  • Scope Of Contract
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2012] ZAGPPHC 66

D F S Flemingo SA (Pty) Ltd v Airports Company South Africa Ltd and Others (70057/2009)

D F S Flemingo SA (Pty) Ltd v Airports Company South Africa Ltd and Others (70057/2009) [2012] ZAGPPHC 66 (17 May 2012)

The court found that the consideration of the unsolicited 12.5% additional rental offer by the successful bidder was not disclosed to other bidders and was outside the parameters of the ITB. This constituted an irrelevant consideration and rendered the process procedurally unfair and non-transparent, contrary to the requirements of section 217 of the Constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The court held that the tender award was improper and irregular, and that the decision to award the tender to the second respondent must be set aside. The applicant was entitled to cos…

  • Public Procurement
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Irrelevant Considerations
  • Judicial Review
  • Bid Evaluation
  • Constitutional Principles
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2007] ZASCA 26

Minister of Social Development and Others v Phoenix Cash & Carry Pmb CC (189/06, 244/06)

Minister of Social Development and Others v Phoenix Cash & Carry Pmb CC (189/06, 244/06) [2007] ZASCA 26; [2007] 3 All SA 115 (SCA); 2007 (9) BCLR 982 (SCA) (27 March 2007)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Department's tender process was flawed due to undue reliance on formality and vagueness in the bid conditions, particularly clause 17.10. The process failed to properly evaluate Phoenix's bid, which was manifestly superior in price and supported by sufficient evidence of financial resources. The technical committee treated each item of evidence as peremptory and excluded other reasonable means of proof, contrary to the intention of the tender conditions and the principles of fairness, competitiveness, and cost-effectiveness required by section 217 of…

  • Public Procurement
  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Bid Conditions
  • Judicial Review
  • Constitutional Principles
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.