Mahlangu and Another v S (2011 (2) SACR 164 (SCA)) [2011] ZASCA 64; 497/10 (1 April 2011)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
497/10
Judges
Streicher, Shongwe, Petse
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed a corruption appeal by two police officers, upholding findings that they demanded money to terminate an investigation.
S v Ndhlela [2006] ZAGPHC 248; A62/04 (16 March 2006)
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Case number
A62/04
Judges
Willis, Makhanya
The High Court upheld convictions for fraud and failure to disclose a material interest, but ordered the sentence to be subject to correctional supervision.
The appellate court found no fault with the trial court's acceptance of Inspector Wilbers' evidence and rejection of the appellant's version as false beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence established that the appellant, a municipal traffic officer, received marked money from Inspector Wilbers in exchange for not issuing a traffic summons, and that his conduct constituted an offence under section 1(1)(b) of the Corruption Act, 1992. The court held that Inspector Wilbers' conduct did not go beyond creating an opportunity for the appellant to commit the offence, and therefore her evidence was ad…
S v Sadler (57/99) [2000] ZASCA 13; [2000] 2 All SA 121 (A); (28 March 2000)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
57/99
Judges
Marais, Scott, Mthiyane
Appeal against sentence in a corruption and fraud case. The Supreme Court of Appeal substituted four years’ imprisonment for several counts and left other penalties intact.