Nkosi and Another v S (A144/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 73 (6 March 2025)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A144/2024
Judges
Naidoo, Ntanga
The High Court dismissed an appeal against convictions for attempted murder and robbery, finding the state’s evidence corroborated and the trial court’s credibility findings sound.
Morojane v S (A401/19) [2021] ZAGPPHC 795 (18 November 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A401/19
Judges
M C Baloyi, B Neukircher
The court found that the identification of the appellant by Constable Mabunda was reliable, supported by sufficient lighting at the scene and corroborated by other evidence. The trial court correctly applied the cautionary rule to single witness identification and properly assessed the credibility of the witnesses. The appellant's version was found to be improbable and not reasonably possibly true. The appellate court held that there was no basis to interfere with the trial court's findings and that the conviction should stand.
Sibanye Protection Services (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR1175/18) [2021] ZALCJHB 39 (28 January 2021)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Case number
JR1175/18
Judge
P Nkutha-Nkontwana
Labour Court dismissed a review of a CCMA award, holding that the employer’s circumstantial case did not displace equally probable inferences and the commissioner’s credibility findings stood.
JR209 Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others v Homeless People Housing Cooperative Limited and Others (24505/2019) [2019] ZAGPPHC 290 (11 July 2019)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
24505/2019
Judge
A Millar
The High Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal against an earlier contempt-related order, finding no reasonable prospect of success or other compelling reason.
Mvana and Another v S (CA&R212/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 18 (7 March 2018)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CA&R 212/2017
Judges
E Revelas, J Smith
The High Court dismissed an appeal against robbery convictions, finding the complainants’ identification of the appellants reliable and the alibi defences unconvincing.