Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Delict [2022] ZAKZDHC 53

Ngwazi v Minister of Police (7990/2016)

Ngwazi v Minister of Police (7990/2016) [2022] ZAKZDHC 53 (2 December 2022)

The court dismissed a damages claim arising from a police shootout, finding the officers’ use of force was justified by self-defence and necessity.

  • Vicarious Liability
  • Wrongful Shooting
  • Use Of Force
  • Self Defence
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 49
  • Police-use-of-force
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1995] ZASCA 139

S v De Ru (134/94)

S v De Ru (134/94) [1995] ZASCA 139 (23 November 1995)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found no sufficient grounds to disturb the trial court's acceptance of the evidence of Hammond, Nel, and Pienaar, whose testimonies were corroborated and not shown to be the result of improper pressure. The appellant's version of events was found to be highly improbable and inconsistent with the facts. The court held that section 49(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act did not justify the appellant's use of lethal force in the Sasolburg incident, as the circumstances did not warrant such action. The appellant's attempts to conceal the true facts constituted obstruction…

  • Murder
  • Manslaughter
  • Obstruction Of Justice
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 49
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Delict [1992] ZASCA 108

Letsie v McCallum (597/90)

Letsie v McCallum (597/90) [1992] ZASCA 108 (1 June 1992)

The court held that the respondent’s shooting of a fleeing trespasser was unlawful and negligent, and that section 49(1)(b) did not justify the force used.

  • Negligence
  • Contributory Negligence
  • Unlawful Assault
  • Use Of Force In Arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 49
  • Delict
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1984] ZASCA 152

S v Swanepoel (350/83)

S v Swanepoel (350/83) [1984] ZASCA 152; [1985] 1 All SA 427 (A) (29 November 1984)

The court held that the appellant, as the accused, bore the onus to prove on a balance of probabilities that his conduct fell within the protection of section 49(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The appellant failed to establish that there were no reasonable alternatives to using deadly force to effect the arrest or prevent escape. The evidence showed that the appellant could have used other means, such as blocking the vehicle or calling for assistance, and that the deceased did not exhibit conduct amounting to flight or resistance justifying lethal force. The court found that the appellant'…

  • Culpable Homicide
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Statutory Justification
  • Use Of Force In Arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 49
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.