S v Ralepanyana (R193-2019) [2019] ZAFSHC 221 (28 November 2019)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
R193/2019
Judges
AF Jordaan, M Opperman
High Court review: a conviction for receiving stolen property was set aside because stock is excluded from section 37; the matter was remitted for a fresh hearing.
S v Hlongwane (167/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 863 (15 June 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
167/17
Judges
H.J Fabricius, D. S. Fourie
On special review, the High Court set aside a theft conviction after finding the accused was under 18 and Child Justice Act procedures had not been followed.
S v Ramakatsa (6/2016) [2016] ZAFSHC 14 (4 February 2016)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
6/2016
Judges
S. Ebrahim, C. Van Zyl
On special review, the High Court set aside a guilty plea conviction and sentence for driving with excessive blood alcohol after finding procedural irregularities.
S v K T (255/2013) [2013] ZAGPPHC 470 (15 November 2013)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A935/12
Judges
Ismail, Jordaan E
On special review, the High Court set aside a conviction entered under a repealed corruption statute and allowed the accused to be re-charged under the current law.
S v N (57/2013) [2013] ZAGPJHC 229; 2014 (1) SACR 266 (GSJ) (5 September 2013)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
57/2013
Judges
M Victor, Nonyane
High Court review setting aside a child accused’s conviction after the court found diversion procedures under the Child Justice Act were not properly followed.
Pretorius and Others v Magistrate, Durban and Others (AR155/12) [2013] ZAKZPHC 5; 2013 (2) SACR 153 (KZP) (18 January 2013)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
AR155/12
Judges
Kruger, Mokgohloa
The court found that the applicants failed to establish that they did not receive proper, effective, or competent legal representation. The third respondent's version, supported by affidavits and not effectively challenged, indicated that adequate consultations took place and that the defence was conducted in accordance with professional ethics. The applicants' dissatisfaction was largely based on hindsight and the failure of their chosen defence strategy, which does not amount to grave injustice. The court held that misplaced reliance on legal advice, given in good faith, is not a ground for…
S v Mthethwa (A626/2012) [2012] ZAGPPHC 215 (4 September 2012)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A626/2012
Judges
N.P Mngqibisa-Thusi, N M Mavundla
The High Court reviewed a murder conviction and found no irregularity where the accused had participated in proceedings through isiSwazi interpretation.
S v Monyamane (68/2012) [2012] ZAFSHC 146 (12 July 2012)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
68/2012
Judges
Daffue, Snellenburg
Automatic review of a conviction for driving without consent was set aside because the charge sheet was defective, jurisdiction was unproven, and fair-trial rights were infringed.
S v Petersen (29/2012) [2012] ZANCHC 38 (8 June 2012)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
29/2012
Judges
C J Olivier, C C Williams
Special review of a maintenance conviction: the court set aside the guilty finding and sentence, and ordered a de novo hearing before a different magistrate.