Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tax Law [2022] ZATC 5

Taxpayer H v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT 14213)

Taxpayer H v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (IT 14213) [2022] ZATC 5; 85 SATC 35 (9 February 2022)

The Tax Court held that Taxpayer H failed to prove a money-lending trade or income-production purpose for interest deductions, and upheld the understatement penalty.

  • Deductibility Of Interest
  • Money Lending Trade
  • Understatement Penalty
  • Tax Administration Act
  • Income Tax Act
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Tax Law [1997] ZASCA 80

Natal Laeveld Boerdery BK v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste (55/96)

Natal Laeveld Boerdery BK v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste (55/96) [1997] ZASCA 80; 1998 (1) SA 639 (SCA); [1998] 1 All SA 5 (A); (26 September 1997)

The court held that interest on a loan used to buy out a member of a close corporation was not deductible, because the dominant purpose was not income production.

  • Deductibility Of Interest
  • Purpose Of Expenditure
  • Income Tax Act Section 11a
  • Income Tax Act Section 23g
  • Tax-law
  • Interest-deduction
Read case analysis
Tax Law [1996] ZASCA 102

Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Sunnyside Centre (Pty) Ltd. (86/95)

Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Sunnyside Centre (Pty) Ltd. (86/95) [1996] ZASCA 102; 1997 (1) SA 68 (SCA); (20 September 1996)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the interest paid by Sunnyside Centre (Pty) Ltd to UBS in excess of interest received from SGH was not deductible under section 11(a) and section 23(g) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. The Court found that the arrangement was primarily intended to benefit Agros (Pty) Ltd, another group company, by securing cheaper finance, and not to further Sunnyside's own trade or profitability. There was no evidence that Sunnyside intended to earn a profit from the transaction, nor that the expenditure was wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of its trade.…

  • Deductibility Of Interest
  • Income Tax Act 58 Of 1962
  • Dual Purpose Expenditure
  • Commercial Expediency
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.