Mohlala v Mashamaite and Others (2022/059691) [2024] ZAGPJHC 607 (4 July 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2022/059691
Judge
S D J Wilson
The court found that the affidavits and annexure relied upon by the applicant constitute a valid deed of alienation for the purposes of section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act. The respondent's denials were rejected as vague and unsupported. The absence of certain terms prescribed by section 6 of the Act did not render the deed void, as those terms were not material to the agreement and the purchaser did not seek to avoid the contract. However, due to the involvement of the state in the allocation and development of the property, and the restrictions imposed by section 10A of the Housing A…
Stucky v Brechoost CC and Another (D5105/2020) [2021] ZAKZDHC 26 (18 August 2021)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
D5105/2020
Judge
Chetty
The High Court granted condonation for a late replying affidavit, but dismissed an application to compel signature of land-sale documents for failing section 2(1) formalities.
Mungur v Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform (478/2011) [2014] ZAECPEHC 86 (11 December 2014)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Case number
478/2011
Judge
RWN Brooks
The court held that the correspondence between the parties identified the purchaser, seller, property, and purchase price with sufficient accuracy to satisfy the essentialia of a contract for the sale of land. The absence of a written term specifying the method of payment does not invalidate the agreement, as the common law position—cash payment against transfer—applies unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. There was no evidence of any agreement to deviate from the common law position. Therefore, the correspondence constitutes a valid deed of alienation under section 2(1) of the Alien…