South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 1 court collection
Last checked: 12 Oct 2026, 06:32 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

30 May 1994

Land And Property [1994] ZASCA 85

Rosebank Mall (Pty) Ltd v Johannesburg City Council (659/92)

Rosebank Mall (Pty) Ltd v Johannesburg City Council (659/92) [1994] ZASCA 85 (30 May 1994)

Court: Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number: 659/92
Judges: Hoexter, Botha, EM Grosskopf, Kumleben, Van Den Heever

The court held that a development contribution under the repealed 1965 Ordinance remained pending and enforceable when the 1986 Ordinance began.

Town Planning Ordinance
Development Contribution
Statutory Interpretation
Pending Matter
Repeal And Savings
Municipal Taxation

Read case analysis

12 Nov 1992

Land And Property [1992] ZASCA 192

City Council of Johannesburg v Norven Investments (Pty) Ltd. (386/91)

City Council of Johannesburg v Norven Investments (Pty) Ltd. (386/91) [1992] ZASCA 192; [1993] 1 All SA 338 (A) (12 November 1992)

Court: Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number: 386/91
Judges: EM Grosskopf, Eksteen, Nienaber, Howie, Van Coller

The court held that development contributions under section 51(4)(a) of the Ordinance were immediately payable and were not deferred until the owner exploited the rezoning benefit.

Development Contribution
Town Planning Scheme
Exception Procedure
Municipal Taxation
Development-contribution
Town-planning-scheme

Read case analysis

Explore more

South Africa Case Law

Search and filter South Africa case law

Rosebank Mall (Pty) Ltd v Johannesburg City Council (659/92)

City Council of Johannesburg v Norven Investments (Pty) Ltd. (386/91)