Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 452

Highlande Energy (Pty) Ltd and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited and Others (2025/058512)

Highlande Energy (Pty) Ltd and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited and Others (2025/058512) [2025] ZAGPJHC 452 (8 May 2025)

The court upheld a jurisdictional point in limine and dismissed an urgent application about a company bank account and disputed directorships.

  • Jurisdiction
  • Interdict
  • Directorship Dispute
  • Shareholder Rights
  • Bank Account Access
  • Urgent-application
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAMPMHC 11

Mamokebe Investment (Pty) Limited v Provincial Commissioner of the South African Police Services, Mpumalanga and Others (6453/2024)

Mamokebe Investment (Pty) Limited v Provincial Commissioner of the South African Police Services, Mpumalanga and Others (6453/2024) [2025] ZAMPMHC 11 (7 February 2025)

The High Court upheld objections to locus standi and urgency, granted intervention to rival directors, dismissed the counter-application, and discharged the interim interdict.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Locus Standi
  • Urgent Application
  • Joinder
  • Lis Pendens
  • Directorship Dispute
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2011] ZAGPJHC 196

East Rock Trading 7 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Eagle Valley Granite (Pty) Ltd and Others (11/33767)

East Rock Trading 7 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Eagle Valley Granite (Pty) Ltd and Others (11/33767) [2011] ZAGPJHC 196 (23 September 2011)

The court found that the applicants had sufficiently explained the delay in bringing the application and that, despite the delay, the matter remained urgent because the respondents intended to hold a meeting that could irreversibly affect the applicants' rights. The applicants established a prima facie right as shareholder and director to prevent the meeting and the passing of resolutions that would impact their interests. The court was satisfied that irreparable harm would result if the meeting proceeded, as reversing decisions taken would be impractical. The balance of convenience favoured…

  • Interim Interdict
  • Urgent Application
  • Directorship Dispute
  • Shareholder Rights
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2007] ZAGPHC 229

Pascal v Pascal (11967/07, 11968/07)

Pascal v Pascal (11967/07, 11968/07) [2007] ZAGPHC 229 (5 October 2007)

The High Court refused security for costs in a father-son company dispute, but granted discovery, supplementation of affidavits, and costs to Senior.

  • Security For Costs
  • Discovery In Application Proceedings
  • Peregrinus And Incola
  • Directorship Dispute
  • Interdict
  • Arbitration Referral
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.