Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Lutzkie and Others v Kilken Platinum (Pty) Ltd and Others (37252/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 497 (28 May 2024)
The High Court referred a section 163 oppression application to trial because of material factual disputes, while granting interim access and board-related relief.
Kipp Consulting Engineers JV Mashaipone General Construction CC v MEC for the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform: Limpopo Province (7741/2020) [2023] ZALMPPHC 73 (15 August 2023)
The High Court held that the contract’s dispute mechanism had been exhausted in substance and dismissed the defendant’s special plea of lack of jurisdiction with costs.
Hlano Financial Services (PTY) Ltd v Member of the Executive Council for Human Settlements and Another (40390/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 645 (19 August 2022)
The court dismissed a counterclaim, upheld an expert’s award under a process agreement, and made the award an order of court.
TUV SUD South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Eskom Holdings Limited (2020/11544) [2022] ZAGPJHC 158 (18 March 2022)
The High Court held that TÜV SÜD was entitled to payment for services rendered to Eskom under a Task Order linked to the existing NEC3 contract.
Du Plooy v Van Zyl (UM 197/2021) [2022] ZANWHC 2 (16 February 2022)
The High Court discharged a rule nisi in an urgent electricity-disconnection dispute, holding the applicants failed to show a prima facie right to interdictory relief.
Phiri v Mathopa and Other (50550/2019) [2019] ZAGPPHC 554 (1 November 2019)
The High Court dismissed an urgent application to stop a shareholder from removing the applicant as director, and struck out scandalous allegations.
Valortrade 74 (Pty) Ltd t/a MC Steelworks v Sasol Chemical Industries Limited (3360/2016) [2018] ZAFSHC 41 (12 April 2018)
High Court dismissed an application for condonation, finding a late dispute referral under an arbitration clause was unjustified and caused no proven undue hardship.
Ascension Properties Limited v Sebola (2015/05678) [2016] ZAGPJHC 190 (8 July 2016)
The High Court granted ejectment after finding the respondent was in rental arrears and that the lease’s dispute-resolution clause did not bar the court from hearing the matter.
Thabula Trade and Invest 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ruwacon (Pty) Ltd and Others (866/2016) [2016] ZAFSHC 76 (2 June 2016)
The court found that the dispute resolution clause in the subcontracts was permissive, not mandatory, and did not preclude the applicant from seeking relief in court. The retention clauses in both subcontracts were interpreted to mean that retention monies became payable upon final completion as certified by the engineer, and not subject to a further defects liability period or contingent on the main contractor first receiving payment from the employer. The court accepted the close-out reports from the engineer as certification of final completion and satisfaction with the retention work. The…
Source excerpt
Divine Inspiration Trading 130 (Pty) Limited v Aveng Greenaker-LTA (Pty) Ltd and Others (2015/10455) [2016] ZAGPJHC 99 (13 May 2016)
The High Court dismissed an application seeking declarations and arbitration-related relief under a FIDIC subcontract, finding the relief misdirected and improperly pleaded.
Explore more
