Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2015] ZALCJHB 204

SATAWU and Another v MEC: Gauteng for Roads & Transport and Others (J1142/15)

SATAWU and Another v MEC: Gauteng for Roads & Transport and Others (J1142/15) [2015] ZALCJHB 204; (2015) 36 ILJ 3155 (LC) (15 July 2015)

The court found that while certain components of Putco's business—such as the contractual right to perform services, a general customer base, the right of use of bus stops and terminals, one depot, and some former drivers—were transferred to Autopax, these were insufficient and too fragmented to constitute a transfer of a business as a going concern. The majority of key assets, including buses, depots, and most employees, remained with Putco. The court emphasised that section 197 requires the transfer of a discrete, autonomous, and identifiable business undertaking, which was not present in t…

  • Section 197 Transfer
  • Outsourcing
  • Going Concern
  • Change Of Service Provider
  • Employment Protection
  • Government Subsidy
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.