Sekano v Tiger Brands Ltd (J467/17)
Sekano v Tiger Brands Ltd (J467/17) [2017] ZALCJHB 188 (6 March 2017)
The court held that the applicant failed to meet the high threshold for judicial intervention in internal disciplinary proceedings. The grievance process had run its course, and the disciplinary hearing was a distinct process relating to alleged misrepresentation. The applicant did not demonstrate any nexus between the grievance and the disciplinary action, nor did she establish victimisation or exceptional circumstances warranting intervention. Her apprehension of prejudice was speculative, and she retained remedies under the LRA should she be dismissed. Consequently, the application for int…
Source excerpt
- Interdict Against Disciplinary Proceedings
- Abuse Of Process
- Grievance Policy
- Exceptional Circumstances For Intervention