S v Disten (106/87)
S v Disten (106/87) [1987] ZASCA 98 (24 September 1987)
The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial court misdirected itself by failing to properly consider whether the appellant's disadvantaged background, youth, and the influence of alcohol and drugs constituted extenuating circumstances. The trial court focused on the appellant's character and maturity at the time of trial, which was irrelevant to the assessment of extenuating circumstances at the time of the crime. The appellate court held that these factors, in their cumulative effect, did affect the appellant's state of mind and reduced his moral blameworthiness. Consequently, the findi…
Source excerpt
- Extenuating Circumstances
- Murder
- Sentencing
- Youth Offenders
- Influence Of Intoxicants