Wesbank A Division of Firstrand v Magaladi (62969/2013) [2018] ZAGPPHC 724 (13 February 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
62969/2013
Judge
NV Khumalo
The court granted Wesbank interim attachment of a financed vehicle pending trial, finding cancellation, prima facie rights, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience.
SA Taxi Finance Solutions (Pty) Ltd v Kubheka and Another (45332/2012) [2013] ZAGPPHC 439 (5 December 2013)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
45332/2012
Judge
Mogotsi
The High Court granted an interim attachment order for a leased taxi pending trial, finding a prima facie right, balance of convenience, and no adequate alternative remedy.
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Coetzee (10321/2010) [2011] ZAWCHC 7 (22 February 2011)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
10321/2010
Judge
Katz AJ
The High Court granted Mercedes-Benz interim attachment of a financed vehicle pending action, finding cancellation and ownership established on a prima facie basis.
SA Taxi Securitisation (Pty) Ltd v Chesane (26382/2009) [2010] ZAGPJHC 30; 2010 (6) SA 557 (GSJ) (1 April 2010)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
26382/2009
Judge
P Boruchowitz
The High Court granted interim attachment of two leased taxis pending trial, holding that the National Credit Act did not abolish the common-law remedy.
Citibank N.A v Van Zyl and Another (3805/2004) [2004] ZAFSHC 131 (9 December 2004)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
3805/2004
Judge
C.H.G. Van der Merwe
The High Court has jurisdiction to enforce contempt proceedings for non-compliance with magistrate's court orders where good and sufficient circumstances exist, as confirmed by the Constitutional Court in Bannatyne v Bannatyne. The interim attachment order granted by the magistrate's court was interlocutory and not appealable; thus, the notice of appeal did not suspend its operation. The first respondent, as sole trustee, was served with and informed of the orders and failed to comply, providing no credible explanation for non-compliance. The evidence established beyond reasonable doubt that…