Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZAGPPHC 74

Fourche v A to Z Motors CC (27397/2021)

Fourche v A to Z Motors CC (27397/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 74 (8 February 2022)

Summary judgment was granted for R3 million plus interest and punitive costs after the court found the defendant’s denial of the investment agreement was not bona fide.

  • Investment Agreement
  • Summary Judgment
  • Contractual Repudiation
  • Mandate And Authority
  • Summary-judgment
  • Investment-agreement
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAGPPHC 926

Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd v Martycell Properties CC (55004/2012)

Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd v Martycell Properties CC (55004/2012) [2016] ZAGPPHC 926 (30 September 2016)

The High Court varied an earlier interlocutory order to preserve monthly net rental income pending trial, finding changed circumstances and a prima facie right.

  • Interim Interdict
  • Variation Of Interlocutory Order
  • Loan Agreement Dispute
  • Investment Agreement
  • Preservation Of Rental Income
  • Interim-interdict
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2009] ZAGPPHC 34

Sampsons Building (Pty) Ltd v Stanlib Wealth Management Ltd and Another (33002/2004)

Sampsons Building (Pty) Ltd v Stanlib Wealth Management Ltd and Another (33002/2004) [2009] ZAGPPHC 34 (28 April 2009)

The court held that payment by cheque is conditional upon the cheque being honoured. Since the cheque for R5 million was dishonoured, the plaintiff did not comply with its obligation to make payment under the investment agreement. The obligation of the first defendant to invest funds was consecutive to the plaintiff's obligation to provide those funds. As the plaintiff failed to perform its part of the contract, it could not claim performance from the first defendant. The plaintiff's claim was therefore dismissed, and it was ordered to pay the costs of the first defendant, including the costs…

  • Contractual Performance
  • Payment By Cheque
  • Investment Agreement
  • Failure Of Consideration
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.