Motsoane v Legal Aid South Africs and Others (3449/2023; 5153/2022) [2024] ZAFSHC 267 (26 August 2024)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
3449/2023; 5153/2022
Judge
Molitsoane
The High Court dismissed an application alleging ineffective legal aid and a contempt claim. The applicant failed to prove service, non-compliance, or factual support.
Motsoane v Chairperson the Board Legal Aid South Africa and Others (5153/2022; 3449/2023; 1857/2021) [2024] ZAFSHC 9 (18 January 2024)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
5153/2022; 3449/2023; 1857/2021
Judge
Van Zyl
The court consolidated three related applications, joined the South African Human Rights Commission, and set timelines for affidavit and argument filing.
W M J Wellen-Griqua Paramount Chief/King and Others v Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others (2998/2018) [2022] ZANCHC 53 (16 September 2022)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
2998/2018
Judge
C C Williams
The High Court held it lacked jurisdiction to order legal aid in a land restitution matter and dismissed prayers 39 to 41, with no costs order.
Legal Aid South Africa v S and Others (SS124/07) [2010] ZAWCHC 17 (16 February 2010)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
SS124/07
Judge
Yekiso
The High Court dismissed Legal Aid South Africa’s application for leave to appeal, holding it lacked locus standi because it was not a party, and finding no prospect of success.
Acting Premier Western Cape v Regional Magistrate for the District of Bellville Division of the Western Cape, Le Grange NO and Others (8098/04) [2005] ZAWCHC 85; 2006 (2) SA 79 (C); 2006 (1) SACR 351 (C) (15 November 2005)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
8098/04
Judge
R B Cleaver
The court held that the magistrate exceeded his statutory authority by ordering the Provincial Government to fund legal representation for the accused. The magistrate's court, being a creature of statute, has no inherent jurisdiction and cannot make orders against third parties not connected to the criminal trial. Section 342A of the Criminal Procedure Act does not empower a magistrate to overturn a prior refusal by the Provincial Government to fund legal representation, nor does it authorize orders imposing financial obligations on the Province. The proper entity for providing legal represen…