Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2002] ZALCJHB 24

Rustenburg Platinum Mines v Nosilela and Others (JR381/01)

Rustenburg Platinum Mines v Nosilela and Others (JR381/01) [2002] ZALCJHB 24 (22 January 2002)

The court held that there was no evidence that the 2nd to 22nd respondents had authorised Mr Nosilela to refer the dispute on their behalf. While they signed a list attached to the referral for arbitration, this did not constitute a mandate for the initial referral to the CCMA. The law requires proper authorisation, such as a power of attorney or other mandate, for one employee to refer a dispute on behalf of others. The Commissioner’s finding that the 2nd to 22nd respondents properly referred the dispute was therefore incorrect in law and reviewable. The referral in respect of the first resp…

  • Referral Of Dispute
  • Mandate To Refer
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Commission For Conciliation Mediation And Arbitration
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.