S v Jara (413/2005)
S v Jara (413/2005) [2005] ZAFSHC 48 (12 May 2005)
The sentence imposed by the magistrate was not in accordance with the mandatory provisions of section 17E of Act 140/1992, which compels a sentence of imprisonment for dealing in dagga. The magistrate conceded the error, and the court set aside the original sentence and substituted it with a sentence that complies with the statutory requirements: eighteen months imprisonment wholly suspended for three years on condition that the accused is not convicted of contravening section 5(b) of Act 140/1992 during the suspension period, and a further fine of R5,000 or eighteen months imprisonment.
Source excerpt
- Sentencing
- Abuse Of Dependence Producing Substances Act
- Dealing In Dagga
- Mandatory Imprisonment