S v Mahlangu and Others (0025/10) [2011] ZAGPJHC 227; 2012 (2) SACR 373 (GSJ) (2 August 2011)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
0025/10
Judge
Satchwell
The court found that although the accused were relatively young and had spent a significant period in custody awaiting trial, these factors did not amount to substantial and compelling circumstances sufficient to justify deviation from the prescribed minimum sentences. The murder was premeditated, brutal, and committed in the course of a robbery with aggravating circumstances. The personal circumstances of the accused, including their difficult upbringing and lack of education, were acknowledged but did not outweigh the gravity of the offences. The court held that the sentences for murder and…
S v Shandu (214/92) [1993] ZASCA 29 (15 March 1993)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
214/92
Judges
Milne, Eksteen, Van Coller
The court found that the appellant played a leading role in the planned and brutal murder of an elderly and defenceless man, motivated by the desire to avoid detection for robbery. The mitigating factors advanced by the appellant were either unsupported by evidence or insignificant compared to the aggravating circumstances, which included the calculated nature of the crime, the vulnerability of the victim, the appellant's prior violent convictions, and the increase in similar attacks in the area. The court held that the death sentence was justified, as the interests of retribution and deterre…
S v Simbaranda (67/89) [1989] ZASCA 107 (19 September 1989)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
67/89
Judges
V Vivier, HJ van Heerden, MT Steyn
The Appellate Division upheld death sentences for murder and robbery, finding the appellant actively participated in a planned robbery and killings and showed no mitigating circumstances.