S v Mavuso (HC09/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 268 (7 June 2024)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
HC09/2024
Judges
Dibetso-Bodibe, AH Petersen
High Court review set aside an undefended accused’s theft conviction and sentence after finding multiple procedural irregularities in plea, mitigation, and firearm proceedings.
S v Bergman; S v Matume (14 /884/2021; T1715/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 60; 2023 (1) SACR 533 (WCC) (17 March 2023)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
14 /884/2021; T1715/2018
Judges
N Ralarala, C.N. Nziweni
The High Court found that in both matters, the magistrates failed to adequately canvass all the elements of the offences during plea proceedings. In Bergman, the questioning did not establish intention or unlawfulness, and the magistrate conceded this error. In Matume, the accused's lack of knowledge regarding the unlawfulness of his conduct was not properly addressed, and the court failed to invoke section 113 of the CPA when a defence was raised. The sentences imposed, particularly the suspended sentence in Matume, were not competently formulated as they lacked clarity regarding the period…
S v Kotze; S v Ntulo (371/2022;363/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 15; 2023 (1) SACR 426 (WCC) (25 January 2023)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
371/2022;363/2022
Judges
Lekhuleni, Nziweni
High Court review of two magistrates’ court plea records set aside Kotze’s conviction and sentence and amended Ntulo’s conviction to negligent driving.
S v Elmie (143/21; 16/2021) [2021] ZAWCHC 188 (11 May 2021)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
143/21; 16/2021
Judges
Lekhuleni, Henney
The magistrate's questioning of the unrepresented accused during plea proceedings was perfunctory and lacked essential detail. The accused did not specifically admit that the tik lolly contained methamphetamine, nor was his knowledge of the substance tested. The court failed to obtain or examine a certificate of analysis to corroborate the nature of the substance. The accused was not properly informed of his rights to review and appeal. These irregularities were gross and led to a complete failure of justice, rendering the conviction and sentence unsafe. The proceedings were not in accordance…
S v Van Der Merwe (A716/2014) [2014] ZAGPPHC 782 (29 September 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A716/2014
Judges
C Pretorius, P Lazarus
High Court review set aside a magistrate’s conviction and sentence for driving under the influence after finding gross irregularities in the section 112 plea proceedings.