Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Disipi v Member of the Executive Council for Health : Northern Cape Province (183/2023 ; 182/2023) [2024] ZANCHC 117 (13 December 2024)
The High Court set aside two particulars of claim for failing to comply with Rule 18(4) and (10), and ordered amendment within 20 days.
Sunwest International (Proprietary) Limited v Padayachee and Others (963/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 393 (26 November 2024)
High Court exception upheld against a counterclaim based on a tacit agreement, because the pleaded agreement lacked key particulars and was too vague to answer.
Starstruck Trading CC t/a Dynamic Construction and Developments v Kohne and Another (4715/2020P) [2024] ZAKZPHC 76 (29 August 2024)
The High Court dismissed an exception to particulars of claim in a building-contract dispute, finding the pleading sufficiently clear to allow a plea.
Van Zyl's Incorporated v Brand N.O. and Others (11460/22) [2022] ZAGPPHC 933 (30 November 2022)
High Court exception upheld because the particulars of claim were vague and embarrassing and failed to plead a coherent cause of action.
Tongaat Hulett Sugar South Africa Limited v Mayola and Other (7694/2020P) [2022] ZAKZPHC 36 (18 August 2022)
The High Court dismissed exceptions to amended particulars of claim after finding that attached invoices and payment documents cured vagueness and pleading defects.
Viljoen v Iraklion Trading CC (2020/36177) [2022] ZAGPJHC 36 (20 January 2022)
The High Court dismissed a Rule 30 application to set aside a plea and counterclaim as irregular, finding no substantial prejudice and adequate compliance with the rules.
Peri Formwork Scaffolding Engineering (Pty) Ltd v Epsilon Developments (Pty) Ltd (2127/2019) [2021] ZAGPJHC 833 (14 December 2021)
The court upheld an exception to part of a counterclaim for repayment of allegedly mistaken rental payments, but dismissed the exception to a second part.
City of Cape Town v ICT Works (Pty) Ltd (8049/19) [2021] ZAWCHC 153 (11 August 2021)
High Court dismissed a Rule 30 application challenging a composite Rule 23 and Rule 30 notice and later exception in a MyCiti bus fare system dispute.
Numill Marketing (Proprietary) Limited v Courtney Roofing (Proprietary) Limited (37440/2019) [2021] ZAGPJHC 873 (28 April 2021)
The court dismissed exceptions to amended particulars of claim, holding that the annexed written agreement was binding and pleaded with sufficient particularity.
Remicor Consulting (Pty) Ltd v Triviron Project Management (Pty) Ltd (6490/2017) [2021] ZAGPJHC 520 (7 April 2021)
The High Court upheld exceptions to a plea for vagueness, holding the defendant had to plead more detail about joint venture payments and project allocations.
Explore more
