Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 42

Vukile Property Fund Limited v SA Retail Properties (Proprietary) Limited ; In respect of the enterprise known as Pinecrest Centre (LM256Mar16)

Vukile Property Fund Limited v SA Retail Properties (Proprietary) Limited ; In respect of the enterprise known as Pinecrest Centre (LM256Mar16) [2016] ZACT 42 (11 May 2016)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
LM256Mar16
Judges
Andreas Wessels, Medi Mokuena, Andiswa Ndoni

The Competition Tribunal approved Vukile’s acquisition of SA Retail Properties’ half share in Pinecrest Centre unconditionally, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Substantial Prevention Or Lessening Of Competition
  • Public Interest
  • Property Management Services
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2008] ZACT 86

Acucap Properties Ltd v Parkdev (Pty) Ltd (79/LM/Jul08)

Acucap Properties Ltd v Parkdev (Pty) Ltd (79/LM/Jul08) [2008] ZACT 86 (6 October 2008)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
79/LM/Jul08
Judges
D Lewis, N Manoim, Y Carrim

The Competition Tribunal approved Acucap’s acquisition of assets and shares in Sycom Fund from Parkdev, finding no substantial competition harm and no public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger Notification
  • Change Of Control
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Property Management Services
  • Asset Management Services
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2006] ZACT 95

Dipula Property Investment Trust and Outward Investments (Pty) Ltd (78/LM/Sep06)

Dipula Property Investment Trust and Outward Investments (Pty) Ltd (78/LM/Sep06) [2006] ZACT 95 (18 December 2006)

Court
Competition Tribunal
Case number
78/LM/Sep06
Judges
N Manoim, Y Carrim, M Mokuena

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Dipula's acquisition of Outward properties, finding no horizontal overlap, no competition harm, and no public interest concerns.

  • Merger Clearance
  • Vertical Integration
  • Property Management Services
  • Merger-clearance
  • Vertical-integration
  • Property-management-services
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.