S v Jordaan (307/92) [1993] ZASCA 184 (29 November 1993)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
307/92
Judges
Eksteen, Van Heerden, Van den Heever
Appeal against death sentences dismissed; the court held that psychopathy, prison frustration, and gang influence did not sufficiently mitigate the planned murder.
S v Cotton (462/91) [1992] ZASCA 20; [1992] 2 All SA 45 (A) (12 March 1992)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
462/91
Judges
EM Grosskopf, Howie, Harms
The Appellate Division set aside a death sentence for murder and substituted life imprisonment, holding that the appellant’s youth and immaturity were substantial mitigating factors.
S v Eiman (273/88) [1989] ZASCA 15 (21 March 1989)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
273/88
Judges
Hefer, EM Grosskopf, MT Steyn
The appellate court held that the trial judge had properly exercised his discretion in imposing the death sentence for murder, notwithstanding the finding of extenuating circumstances. The court found no evidence of misdirection, factual error, or legal mistake. The appellant's psychopathy, while reducing blameworthiness for extenuation, was regarded as an aggravating factor for sentencing due to the danger he posed to society and the prison community. The court rejected the appellant's version of self-defence and provocation, finding it unsupported by the evidence and contradicted by the nat…
S v Kosztur (401/87) [1988] ZASCA 59 (25 May 1988)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
401/87
Judges
Van Heerden, Smalberger, Steyn
Appeal against a death sentence was dismissed after the court found no extenuating circumstances despite psychopathy, drug use, and a troubled background.