Industrial Gas Users Association of SA v National Energy Regulator of SA and Another (63670/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 550 (18 June 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
63670/2021
Judge
Joubert
The High Court set aside NERSA’s approval of Sasol’s gas prices for 2014 to 2023, finding the methodology unlawful and remitting the matter for a new decision.
Municipal Manager: The City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others v San Ridge Heights Rental Property (Pty) Ltd (517/2022) [2023] ZASCA 109 (11 July 2023)
The SCA held that the municipality’s failure to give reasons for classifying property for sanitation tariffs was fatal and remitted the matter for reconsideration.
Reizis NO v MEC for the Department Sport, Arts, Culture and Recreation and Others (A99/2012) [2013] ZAFSHC 20 (28 February 2013)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A99/2012
Judges
Lekale, Rampai
The court held that the MEC lacked authority to decide an appeal not properly before him under the NHRA, set aside that decision, and remitted the matter.
Antoy Investments (Pty) Ltd v Rand Water and Others (159/2007) [2008] ZASCA 10 (20 March 2008)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
159/2007
Judges
Scott, Mthiyane, Combrinck
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that a review success should generally be remitted to the decision-maker, and varied the costs order in the appellant’s favour.
Logbro Properties CC v Bedderson NO and Others (372/2001) [2002] ZASCA 135; [2003] 1 All SA 424 (SCA); 2003 (2) SA 460 (SCA) (18 October 2002)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
372/2001
Judges
Howie JA, Farlam JA, Cameron JA, Heher AJA, Lewis AJA
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the provincial tender committee, when reconsidering the tenders after the High Court set aside the original award, was entitled to take into account supervening considerations such as the increase in property values. The committee's mandate was to dispose of public assets in the public interest, and it would have been improper to ignore the legitimate interest of the State in obtaining the best possible price. However, the court found that procedural fairness required the committee to afford the appellant and other compliant tenderers an opportunity to ma…
